Skip to main content

Security report for rload.es

Rload · Technology · Spain

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rload is a small digital creative agency based in Madrid, Spain, specializing in web design, ecommerce stores, app development, and user experience (UX) design. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional digital creative services locally. The website presents a professional image with good content quality and consistent branding, supported by structured data confirming business contact details and operating hours. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and explicit policies. WHOIS data is inaccessible due to Red.es restrictions, limiting domain trust assessment. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rload.es

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rload operates as a local digital agency in Madrid, focusing on creative digital solutions such as website and app development. Its market position is that of a small, specialized service provider catering to local clients. The business model revolves around project-based client engagements in technology and digital services. The presence on Awwwards and use of analytics tools suggest a focus on quality and performance monitoring. Lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company appears to maintain a lean operation with a clear service offering and target audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled (implied by external script sources using HTTPS) but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces tracking but no visible consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement in compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and forms for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Request authorized WHOIS access or publish domain registration details to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rload
Description
Estudio creativo digital, diseño y desarollo de páginas web, tiendas online ecommerce, Apps, UX y mucho más en Madrid.
Key services
Web design, Ecommerce stores, App development, User Experience (UX) design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lax.js (scroll animations), SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data is inaccessible due to Red.es query restrictions.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to phone and postal address in Madrid from JSON-LD.
  4. No contact emails or contact forms detected in the HTML content.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in HTML.
  7. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to digital creative services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery 1.8.3. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking purposes. The site uses SVG graphics and includes scroll animation libraries like lax.js. The HTML structure includes meta tags for description and viewport settings, but lacks Open Graph or Twitter Card metadata. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tag and responsive CSS. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA landmarks or roles detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta description but no structured Open Graph tags. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the source. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with modern frameworks, improved accessibility, and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rload.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rload.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.