Skip to main content

Security report for rkeeper.cz

RKeeper · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RKeeper.cz is a Czech-based company specializing in point of sale (POS) systems and related software and hardware solutions for the hospitality industry. Established in 2004, the company offers a range of products including Rkeeper7 Manager software, RK7 Pokladna POS systems, mobile waiter applications, and hardware such as monoblocks and tablets. The website targets hospitality businesses primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, positioning itself as an established provider in this niche market. The business model is B2B, focusing on sales, support, and integration services for hospitality clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with common plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and Revolution Slider. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Fonts, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, the use of outdated WordPress and plugin versions poses potential security risks. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a professional design and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookies but lacks important security headers and up-to-date software components. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. These gaps indicate moderate security maturity with room for improvement in compliance and risk management. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires updates to its software stack and the addition of privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include updating WordPress and plugins, implementing security headers, adding GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and publishing security and incident response policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rkeeper.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
90
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RKeeper operates in the hospitality technology sector, providing POS software and hardware solutions tailored to restaurants, cafes, and bars. The company leverages a B2B model, selling integrated systems and offering support services. Its market positioning is that of a regional leader in the Czech and Slovak markets with a history dating back to 2004. The company maintains a portfolio of software products and hardware devices, indicating diversified revenue streams. The website content and structure suggest a focus on professional clients seeking reliable POS solutions. The absence of active social media links and limited marketing tools indicates a traditional or direct sales approach. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the site. Growth indicators include regular news updates and product announcements. Overall, RKeeper appears stable with a focused market niche and moderate digital marketing presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with notable weaknesses. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the site uses outdated WordPress core and plugins, including jQuery and Revolution Slider, which are known vectors for vulnerabilities if not patched. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected, which could expose the site to clickjacking or other attacks. There is no public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, limiting transparency and preparedness. Cookie usage is present but lacks a consent mechanism, raising GDPR compliance concerns. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, reducing privacy risks from third parties. Overall, the site would benefit from modernization, security hardening, and compliance improvements to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
  3. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RKeeper
Description
RKeeper provides point of sale (POS) systems and related software and hardware solutions primarily for the hospitality industry including restaurants, cafes, and bars.
Key services
Rkeeper7 Manager software, RK7 Pokladna POS system, Online monitoring, Store House inventory management, Mobile waiter applications, Hardware including monoblocks, tablets, printers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, PHP, jQuery 1.12.4, RevSlider 5.4.7.2, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Fonts (Roboto), FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookies with expiration

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page or linked pages.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Website uses outdated WordPress and plugin versions which may pose security risks.
  5. No social media links are active; social icons link to root '/' which is likely placeholder.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts.
  7. Content is focused on hospitality POS software and hardware solutions.
  8. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. No GDPR cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an older version of WordPress (4.9.26) with legacy jQuery (1.12.4) and Revolution Slider (5.4.7.2). It uses WPBakery Page Builder for content management and Google Fonts for typography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO metadata is present but minimal. The site does not use modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced analytics. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, requiring updates and modernization to improve security, performance, and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rkeeper.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rkeeper.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.