Skip to main content

Security report for riihisoft.fi

Riihisoft Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Riihisoft Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in software development, device management, and custom enterprise software solutions. The company leverages modern technologies including Microsoft Azure, Umbraco CMS, and .NET frameworks to deliver scalable and efficient IT services. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with Microsoft and Umbraco, as well as a portfolio of reputable clients across various sectors. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site is built on a modern stack with strong performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, anti-forgery tokens, Google reCAPTCHA, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism, indicating a strong security posture. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the website and domain registration data align well, supporting a high legitimacy score and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts to further enhance stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching riihisoft.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Riihisoft operates as a medium-sized software development service provider targeting businesses requiring tailored IT solutions, including cloud, AI, and CMS implementations. Their competitive advantage lies in deep expertise with Microsoft technologies and agile development methodologies. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with Microsoft and Umbraco, enhancing credibility and market reach. Client testimonials and references demonstrate successful project delivery in healthcare, manufacturing, and retail sectors. The business model focuses on long-term partnerships and customized software solutions, supported by a professional online presence and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include a diverse client base and adoption of emerging technologies such as AI and low-code platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, security headers likely present, and anti-spam measures via Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms. Cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and may hinder rapid vulnerability reporting. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file or dedicated security page to improve responsible disclosure processes. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file for responsible reporting.
  3. Add incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Riihisoft Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Riihisoft Oy
Description
Riihisoft Oy on päätelaitehallintaan, verkkopalveluratkaisuihin ja räätälöityihin yritysohjelmistojen kehitykseen keskittynyt palveluyritys.
Key services
software development, device management, web service solutions, custom enterprise software, Umbraco CMS implementations, cloud and AI solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Umbraco CMS, .NET, C#, SQL Server, Microsoft Azure, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes consent management
Frameworks
Umbraco CMS, Microsoft .NET
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Anti-forgery cookies (.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.*)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Leadfeeder, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories.
  3. Contact form includes reCAPTCHA and validation for spam prevention.
  4. Multiple client references and partner badges enhance trust.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Strong GDPR compliance indicators present.
  9. Social media presence on major platforms is linked in footer.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure leveraging Umbraco CMS and Microsoft .NET technologies hosted on Microsoft Azure. The front-end uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript frameworks including jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Performance is optimized with deferred CSS loading and asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations. Integration of Google Analytics and Leadfeeder provides analytics and lead tracking capabilities. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or performance bottlenecks. Opportunities exist to further enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with riihisoft.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review riihisoft.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.