Skip to main content

Security report for rigasfs.lv

Rīgas Futbola Skola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Futbola Skola (RFS) is a well-established municipal football school in Riga, Latvia, founded in 1962. It serves over 500 athletes across various age groups and operates multiple teams competing locally and internationally. The organization also runs football-related projects and tournaments, contributing to the development of football in Latvia. The website reflects a medium-sized educational sports institution with a clear focus on youth sports training and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and good mobile optimization, though some compliance gaps exist such as missing privacy and terms of service pages. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, but incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, supporting the institution's mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigasfs.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rigasfs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rigasfs.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RFS holds a strong market position as the oldest football school in Riga, supported by municipal funding. Its business model focuses on sports education and community engagement rather than commercial profit. Key revenue streams likely include municipal support, merchandise sales, and sports equipment partnerships. The target audience includes youth athletes, parents, and local sports enthusiasts. The organization maintains active social media channels and partners with related domains for merchandise and equipment sales. Growth indicators include ongoing tournaments and active community projects. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance compliance documentation and security transparency to strengthen stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. The WordPress platform and plugins require regular updates to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced user trust signals.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page outlining user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Develop and publish a security incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to reduce security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rīgas valstspilsētas pašvaldība
Registration number
90011524360
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Futbola Skola
Description
Rīgas Futbola skola (RFS) dibināta 1962. gadā un ir senākā futbola skola Rīgā. Pašvaldības iestāde, kurā futbolu apgūst vairāk nekā 500 sportistu dažādās vecuma grupās. Futbola skola pulcē 16 zēnu un 7 meiteņu un sieviešu komandas, kas pārstāv skolu vietējos un starptautiska mēroga turnīros. RFS īsteno futbola projektus, piemēram, "Rīga BUMBO!" turnīru sēriju un citus pasākumus Latvijas futbola attīstībai.
Key services
football training, sports tournaments, equipment sales, football merchandise, sports facility rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Yoast SEO, Easy Facebook Likebox, Slider Revolution, Ultimate Floating Widgets, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based football school site with rich content and active social media integration.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical addresses.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no direct domain registration verification possible.
  7. Site uses HTTPS with good security headers.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. Technical stack is modern and includes popular WordPress plugins.
  10. Site performance is moderate with good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of popular plugins such as LayerSlider, Yoast SEO, and Easy Facebook Likebox, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with good security headers, contributing to a secure browsing experience. Technical debt appears low, but continuous maintenance is necessary to keep plugins and themes updated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigasfs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigasfs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.