Skip to main content

Security report for rigapermanent.lv

Rīgas Permanent Akadēmija · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Permanent Akadēmija is a specialized educational institution based in Latvia, offering professional training in permanent makeup, tattooing, and related cosmetic procedures. The academy emphasizes high-quality instruction by experienced professionals and provides internationally accredited diplomas, enabling graduates to work across Europe and other countries. The website reflects a focused business model targeting individuals seeking to become certified permanent makeup and tattoo specialists, with additional courses in laser removal and social media marketing for client acquisition. Technically, the website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Font Awesome. It integrates Bitrix24 CRM forms for lead capture and employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, though the site content and domain name suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy educational service with moderate technical maturity and some compliance gaps. Strategic enhancements in privacy disclosures, security headers, and WHOIS transparency would strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigapermanent.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The academy occupies a niche market in Latvia's beauty and cosmetic education sector, focusing on permanent makeup and tattoo training. Its competitive advantage lies in offering internationally recognized diplomas and experienced instructors. Revenue streams likely include course fees for various training programs and masterclasses. The target customers are aspiring permanent makeup artists, tattoo specialists, and professionals seeking advanced techniques. The presence of social media links and marketing courses indicates an integrated approach to client acquisition and business growth. The business appears small in size but well-branded and consistent in messaging, with potential for expansion through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The use of HTTPS ensures encrypted communication, and no sensitive data leaks are evident in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of visible privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. Forms are integrated via Bitrix24 CRM but lack explicit anti-CSRF or validation details in the HTML. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not present, suggesting limited formal security governance. Enhancing these areas would mitigate risks and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Verify and display WHOIS domain registration details to improve legitimacy transparency.
  4. Ensure all forms have proper validation and anti-CSRF protections.
  5. Establish and communicate incident response procedures and security policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Permanent Akadēmija
Description
Permanent akadēmija ir permanentā grima un tetovējumu skola ar augsti kvalificētiem, uzticamiem profesionāliem pasniedzējiem ar lielu pieredzi un staptautiski atzīti diplomi.
Key services
Permanent makeup training, Tattoo training, Masterclasses on latest permanent makeup techniques, Laser removal of permanent makeup and tattoos, Laser hair removal training, Carbon peeling procedures training, Social media marketing for client acquisition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix CMS, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bitrix24 CRM forms
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Bitrix24 CRM forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional educational platform for permanent makeup and tattoo training.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and calls to action.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Uses Bitrix CMS and integrates Bitrix24 CRM forms for lead capture.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It uses Font Awesome for icons and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. Bitrix24 CRM forms are embedded for lead capture. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with appropriate meta tags and structured headings. Performance is average, with lazy loading for images and asynchronous script loading. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy disclosures indicate technical debt in compliance and security. Hosting details are not explicit, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigapermanent.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigapermanent.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.