Skip to main content

Security report for rigacomm.com

RIGA COMM · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RIGA COMM is a well-established Baltic business technology event organizer hosting annual exhibitions and multiple conferences in Riga, Latvia. The platform targets business and technology professionals, entrepreneurs, and institutional leaders, offering a comprehensive event experience with specialized conferences covering cybersecurity, fintech, e-commerce, and more. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a WordPress CMS, modern marketing and analytics tools, and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy compliance requirements. However, explicit privacy policies and terms of service are missing, which could be improved to enhance compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and well-positioned in its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rigacomm.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology event sector, focusing on B2B technology exhibitions and conferences in the Baltic region. Its business model revolves around event organization, sponsorships, and partnerships with leading technology firms such as Salesforce and Arrow. The target audience includes business leaders, IT professionals, and government representatives, indicating a broad and influential customer base. The presence of multiple partners and exhibitors suggests a strong ecosystem and market credibility. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and stability of the business. Growth opportunities exist in expanding digital content and enhancing compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, demonstrating baseline security measures. Cookie consent is actively managed via CookieScript, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of DNSSEC and limited security headers indicate areas for improvement. No direct vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. Enhancing these areas would strengthen the security posture and user confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add a terms of service page and a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve legal clarity and security transparency.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information to facilitate security communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RIGA COMM
Description
Baltic Business Technology Fair and Conference held in Riga, Latvia, gathering business and technology professionals from 30+ countries with multiple conferences and exhibitions.
Key services
Business technology exhibition, Multiple specialized conferences (e.g., cybersecurity, fintech, e-commerce, digital marketing), Networking and B2B meeting platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Contact Form 7 plugin, All-in-One Event Calendar plugin, CookieScript consent management
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Contact Form 7
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event platform for Baltic business technology conferences.
  2. Content is rich with multiple conference topics and partner listings.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  5. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no direct emails or phone numbers visible.
  6. Security headers could be improved; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools is evident.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing popular plugins like Contact Form 7 and All-in-One Event Calendar. It leverages jQuery and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rigacomm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rigacomm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.