Skip to main content

Security report for richmondshare.com.br

Education · Brazil

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RichmondShare is a niche educational blog focused on English Language Teaching (ELT) professionals and future teachers, primarily targeting the Brazilian market. The website serves as a free-access platform for sharing ideas, experiences, and reflections within the ELT community. It operates on a WordPress CMS with standard SEO optimizations and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. Hosting infrastructure appears to be on Amazon AWS, providing reliable performance and scalability. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility basics, supporting a positive user experience for its audience. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, as well as contact information, limits its compliance and business transparency. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Overall, RichmondShare is a credible educational resource with room for improvement in privacy compliance and business information transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching richmondshare.com.br

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a specialized blog for ELT professionals, leveraging a free-access content model to engage teachers and educators. Its market niche is well-defined, focusing on English language teaching in Brazil. The business model relies on content sharing and community interaction rather than direct commercial transactions. The use of WordPress and Yoast SEO indicates a focus on organic reach and content discoverability. Integration with Google Analytics and OneTrust for cookie compliance suggests awareness of data privacy regulations, though explicit policies are missing. The site does not display direct monetization or partnership affiliations, indicating a primarily informational and community-driven approach. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance and contact transparency to build trust and authority.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication and basic security. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms with explicit security measures were identified, and no incident response or security policy pages are published. The integration of cookie consent mechanisms via OneTrust and Adopt SDK indicates some compliance with privacy regulations, but the lack of a privacy policy page reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone number for support and incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
RichmondShare is a free-access blog aimed at teachers and future teachers of English as a Foreign Language where ELT professionals (authors, editors, teachers educators, teachers etc) share their ideas, experiences and reflections.
Key services
blog content sharing, professional interaction in ELT
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Analytics
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Compliance
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational blog focused on English Language Teaching (ELT).
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the main HTML content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present via OneTrust and Adopt SDK but no explicit cookie policy page found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Content is in Portuguese (pt-BR) with some English metadata.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting is via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating a reliable backend. The site uses jQuery and standard CSS frameworks for styling and responsiveness. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features are present. However, no advanced security headers or HTTP security policies were detected. The site lacks explicit forms for contact or data collection in the main HTML content. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a content-focused WordPress site with room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with richmondshare.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review richmondshare.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.