Skip to main content

Security report for restopolis.lu

Restopolis · Education · Luxembourg

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Restopolis is a Luxembourg-based service provider specializing in school and university catering. The website offers multilingual content targeting students, adults, and visitors, providing menu consultation, booking, and account management services. The platform integrates with IAM for secure user access and supports sustainable food procurement initiatives. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms using the DNN CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and security. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, though explicit security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and privacy policy available. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification, but the website's professional appearance and government affiliations support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching restopolis.lu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Restopolis holds a solid position in the Luxembourg education sector as a catering service provider. Its business model focuses on providing meal services to educational institutions with clear pricing tiers for learners, adults, and visitors. The company maintains active social media channels and partners with government and educational platforms, enhancing its ecosystem. The multilingual approach and sustainable food initiatives indicate a customer-centric and forward-looking strategy. However, the absence of explicit contact details and WHOIS transparency could be improved to strengthen trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in header policies and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  4. Add explicit company contact information such as support emails and phone numbers to facilitate user communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Restopolis
Description
Restopolis is a trusted partner for school and university catering services in Luxembourg, offering menu consultation, booking, and account management for users.
Key services
Menu consultation, Menu booking and reservation, Account management and loading, Sustainable food procurement initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Magnific Popup, ilightbox, Swiper, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. Content is multilingual with French, German, English, Luxembourgish, and Portuguese versions
  3. Site uses ASP.NET WebForms and DNN CMS
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
  5. Uses Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA
  6. Cookie consent banner present
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  8. Pricing information for school catering services is detailed and multilingual
  9. WHOIS data is missing or malformed, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature technology stack centered on ASP.NET WebForms and the DNN CMS platform, supported by popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap for UI and interactivity. Google Fonts and FontAwesome provide consistent styling and iconography. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics and Tag Manager, with reCAPTCHA protecting forms from abuse. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for multilingual content delivery. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The lack of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with restopolis.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review restopolis.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.