Skip to main content

Security report for request.ee

SIA Request · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Request is a creative design studio based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in web design, development, e-commerce, social media management, and digital marketing. The company positions itself as a top-tier agency in Latvia with multiple industry recognitions and a strong digital presence. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Google Ads. The technical infrastructure leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. However, the domain WHOIS data raises concerns due to an anomalous future creation date and a registrant mismatch, which slightly undermines trust. The website lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies but implements a cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching request.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention request.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for request.ee right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Request operates as a small technology-focused service provider targeting businesses needing web and digital marketing services. Their business model revolves around delivering customized web solutions and creative design, supported by a team of experts. The company has established partnerships and is recognized by reputable platforms like DesignRush and TechBehemoths, indicating a competitive market position. Their revenue streams likely include project-based web development, ongoing social media management, and e-commerce platform development. The company maintains a consistent brand image and actively markets through multiple digital channels, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of Cloudflare services, and secure form handling via WordPress nonces. However, explicit security headers are not clearly visible in the HTML content, and no published security or incident response policies exist. The absence of DNSSEC and a vulnerability disclosure policy are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security policy or incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness.
  4. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Investigate and correct the domain WHOIS registration date anomaly to improve legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Request
VAT number
LV40203423105
Registration number
851974786
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Request
Description
Creative design studio, specializing in web design, development and advertising. We transform visions into reality with a team of experts in web development, social media management, creative design, and e-commerce solutions.
Key services
Web design, Web development, E-commerce solutions, Social media management, Creative design, Digital marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, Shopify Partners, Cloudflare, Meta Platforms SDK, Google Ads, HubSpot, Sendinblue, WonderPush
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens (WordPress admin-ajax nonce present)

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Sendinblue, WonderPush
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Sendinblue, WonderPush
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with extensive use of Elementor and WordPress.
  3. Strong presence of marketing and analytics tools indicating active digital marketing.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main site.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, address, and contact form.
  7. WHOIS data shows suspicious domain creation date and registrant mismatch.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, integrating WooCommerce and Shopify Partners for e-commerce capabilities. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Marketing and analytics tools are extensively used, including HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Sendinblue, and WonderPush, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The technical implementation is robust with minor areas for security header improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with request.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review request.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.