Skip to main content

Security report for reorbit.space

ReOrbit · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ReOrbit is a Finnish-based technology company specializing in the manufacturing of autonomous, software-enabled satellites designed for secure communications and inter-satellite networking. Their flagship product, SiltaSat, offers reliable and flexible satellite solutions in GEO orbit, targeting both commercial and government sectors. The company emphasizes software-defined satellite architectures that allow in-orbit reconfiguration and payload flexibility, positioning itself as a leader in the new space era connectivity market. Technically, the website is built on Webflow and leverages modern web technologies and Cloudflare CDN for delivery. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate severely impacts the security posture, despite the presence of security headers and email authentication mechanisms like SPF and DMARC. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies integrated with consent management via Cookiebot. Contact information is comprehensive, including multiple physical addresses and a GDPR-compliant contact form. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure communications and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of reorbit.space. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reorbit.space

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reorbit.space, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for reorbit.space.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ReOrbit operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, focusing on satellite manufacturing and software development for secure space communications. Their business model revolves around delivering modular, software-defined satellite solutions that cater to diverse payload and connectivity needs. The company targets government and commercial customers requiring sovereign control over satellite communications. Their market position is that of an innovator and leader in software-enabled satellite technology, supported by a partner network for hardware sourcing. The company maintains a global footprint with offices in Finland, Argentina, and India, indicating a strategic approach to international markets. The website content and social media presence reflect a growth-oriented and technologically advanced company with a focus on resilience and flexibility in space networks.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but compromised by the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure web communications. While security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options are implemented, they are not fully optimized (e.g., HSTS lacks includeSubDomains and preload). Email security is robust with SPF and DMARC policies in place, reducing phishing risks. The website uses Cloudflare CDN but does not show evidence of active WAF or security challenge mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could be a gap in security governance. The contact form includes GDPR consent, indicating awareness of data protection requirements. Overall, the site needs immediate SSL/TLS remediation and enhanced security policy transparency to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to protect data in transit.
  3. Enhance HSTS policy by including subdomains and submitting for preload to prevent downgrade attacks.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to build trust and readiness.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and configurations to align with best practices.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  8. Consider adding terms of service and incident response contact information for comprehensive governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring global content delivery. However, performance metrics indicate slow loading times and zero reported resource counts, suggesting possible measurement issues or optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessibility features present but basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, scripts, and media content, all reputable. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100 −5Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 −10Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reorbit.space. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reorbit.space.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.