Skip to main content

Security report for renren.com

成都人人互娱科技有限公司 · Technology · China

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

人人网由成都人人互娱科技有限公司运营，是一家成立于1999年的中国社交网络平台，致力于为广大用户提供稳定安全的社交体验。网站内容主要展示服务升级公告及公司联系信息，面向普通大众用户。技术基础较为传统，采用HTML5和CSS3实现响应式设计，移动端优化良好。托管于阿里云，域名注册历史悠久，显示业务稳定性较高。安全方面，网站缺少安全相关HTTP头部和公开的安全政策，未见隐私政策和Cookie政策，合规性不足，存在改进空间。整体风险中等，建议加强安全防护和合规披露以提升用户信任和业务稳健性。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renren.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention renren.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
111,121
Employees
2
Customers
111,062
Third parties
57
Weak passwords
69%

Latest record dated 2025-11-13 · 101 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for renren.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –renren.com2025-11-13
  • –www.renren.com2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

人人网作为中国知名社交平台，拥有较长的市场历史和稳定的用户基础。其业务模式为社交网络服务，目标客户为普通互联网用户。公司通过持续的服务升级保持市场竞争力，但缺乏公开的隐私和安全政策可能影响用户信任。未发现合作伙伴或子公司信息，托管于阿里云，符合中国互联网企业常见架构。未来可通过完善合规体系和安全管理提升市场地位和用户满意度。

Security posture

当前安全成熟度较低，网站未启用DNSSEC，缺少安全HTTP头部，未公开安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道。无明显敏感数据泄露或漏洞迹象，但缺乏透明的安全管理和合规披露。建议尽快部署安全头部，启用DNSSEC，公开隐私政策和安全响应联系方式，提升整体安全防护和合规水平，降低潜在风险。

Recommendations

  1. 启用DNSSEC以增强域名安全防护
  2. 增加安全相关HTTP头部，如Content-Security-Policy和X-Frame-Options
  3. 公开隐私政策和Cookie政策，提升合规性和用户信任
  4. 建立安全事件响应和漏洞披露机制，增强安全透明度
  5. 持续优化网站性能和移动端体验，提升用户满意度
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
成都人人互娱科技有限公司
Description
人人网是一家社交网络平台，提供社交服务，面向广大用户，致力于打造稳定安全的社交体验。
Key services
社交网络服务
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Responsive Design
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. 网站为人人网官方主页，内容为服务升级公告及公司联系信息。
  2. 无隐私政策、Cookie政策或服务条款页面链接，合规性不足。
  3. 无安全相关HTTP头部信息，安全防护措施较弱。
  4. 无明显广告或追踪技术，用户隐私风险较低。
  5. WHOIS信息显示域名长期注册，注册商为阿里云，符合中国互联网企业常见托管。
  6. 网站设计简洁，移动端优化良好，但内容较为基础。
  7. 无社交媒体链接或外部营销工具。
  8. 无安全事件响应或漏洞披露信息，安全管理透明度不足。
Technical notes

Notes

网站采用基础HTML5和CSS3技术，结构简洁，支持响应式设计，移动端表现良好。托管于阿里云，域名注册历史悠久，显示技术基础稳定。缺少现代安全防护措施和SEO优化，未使用明显的CMS或框架。性能适中，无明显技术债务，但存在提升空间。建议引入现代前端框架和安全技术，完善SEO和无障碍支持，提升整体技术成熟度。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renren.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renren.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.