Skip to main content

Security report for remotejs.com

TrackJS · Technology · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RemoteJS is a free remote JavaScript debugging service offered by TrackJS LLC, targeting JavaScript developers and web engineers who need to debug applications remotely. The website provides tools to connect to remote browser sessions, monitor events, execute JavaScript remotely, and capture screenshots to aid in debugging. The service is positioned as a complementary offering to TrackJS's core error monitoring products, leveraging TrackJS's brand and technology infrastructure. The domain and website content are consistent with the business timeline and branding, indicating a legitimate and focused niche product. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and TrackJS's own error monitoring scripts. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration, includes responsive design elements, and embeds multimedia content such as Vimeo videos. However, no CMS or hosting provider beyond the registrar is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses TrackJS for error monitoring, which is a positive indicator. However, it lacks visible security headers in the HTML content and does not provide privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which limits direct communication channels for security or business inquiries. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional but could improve significantly in privacy compliance and transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, reduces trust and compliance posture. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security and business credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of remotejs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remotejs.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RemoteJS operates as a specialized tool within the JavaScript debugging niche, leveraging the established TrackJS brand to gain market trust. Its free service model suggests a strategy to attract developers and teams who may later convert to paid TrackJS offerings. The target audience includes web developers and engineers requiring real-time remote debugging capabilities. The partnership with Request Metrics indicates an ecosystem approach to performance and error monitoring. The business is small-sized, technology-focused, and founded around 2019, consistent with the domain registration. The absence of direct contact information and formal policies suggests a lean operation or a product in early maturity stages. The social media presence and integration with TrackJS's main site support brand consistency and market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of TrackJS error monitoring scripts. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. The lack of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms and security.txt files reduces the ability for external parties to report security issues responsibly. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements in policy publication, security headers, and incident response readiness to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a terms of service page clearly outlining user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Implement and display security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response email addresses.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrackJS
Description
Connect to remote browser sessions and debug your JavaScript applications.
Key services
Remote JavaScript debugging, Remote browser event monitoring, Remote JavaScript execution, Remote screenshots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TrackJS error monitoring, Request Metrics, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Vimeo embed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of TrackJS for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TrackJS, Request Metrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free service product from TrackJS LLC
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers provided
  4. Social media presence is linked to TrackJS official accounts
  5. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  6. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected on the main page
  8. Good branding consistency with TrackJS parent company
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No incident response or security contact information provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of third-party analytics and monitoring tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TrackJS, and Request Metrics. The use of FontAwesome and Google Fonts enhances UI aesthetics. The site embeds multimedia content via Vimeo and uses asynchronous script loading for performance optimization. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The domain is registered with NameCheap and uses registrar name servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and formal privacy mechanisms indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remotejs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remotejs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.