Skip to main content

Security report for remotejs.com

TrackJS · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RemoteJS is a specialized web service offering remote JavaScript debugging capabilities, enabling developers to connect to remote browser sessions and interactively debug their applications in real-time. It is a free service provided by TrackJS LLC, a company known for JavaScript error monitoring solutions. The website positions itself as a niche tool within the web development and debugging ecosystem, targeting JavaScript developers and engineers who require advanced remote debugging tools. The business model appears to be a value-added free service complementing TrackJS's commercial offerings, enhancing their market presence in developer tooling. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, TrackJS error monitoring scripts, and performance monitoring via Request Metrics. The site uses HTTPS and includes structured data for SEO. The design is professional and mobile-optimized with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some technical aspects such as DNSSEC are not enabled, and no CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified beyond the registrar. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and uses TrackJS for error monitoring, which is a positive security practice. However, it lacks visible security headers, published privacy or cookie policies, terms of service, and incident response information. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which limits direct communication channels. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, with no privacy protection masking registrant details, and the domain age aligns with the business timeline. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but has compliance gaps regarding privacy and cookie policies and could improve security posture by adding security headers and incident response disclosures. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding terms of service, enabling DNSSEC, and improving security headers to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remotejs.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RemoteJS operates as a free developer tool under the TrackJS brand, targeting JavaScript developers needing remote debugging capabilities. Its market positioning leverages TrackJS's established reputation in JavaScript error monitoring, providing a complementary service that enhances developer experience. The business model likely relies on TrackJS's commercial products for revenue, with RemoteJS serving as a lead generation or brand extension tool. The target customers are web developers and engineers working on complex JavaScript applications. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains like requestmetrics.com, indicating a broader monitoring and performance toolset. Growth indicators include consistent branding and integration with TrackJS services. The company maintains a focused product offering without visible subsidiaries or extensive diversification.

Security posture

The security maturity of RemoteJS is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS and integrates TrackJS error monitoring, which helps detect and respond to client-side errors. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which supports legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a free service but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrackJS
Description
Connect to remote browser sessions and debug your JavaScript applications. RemoteJS is a free service from TrackJS that enables real-time remote JavaScript debugging.
Key services
Remote JavaScript debugging, Remote browser event monitoring, Remote JavaScript execution, Remote screenshots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, TrackJS error monitoring, Request Metrics, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Roboto, Ubuntu)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and script sources)
  • Use of TrackJS for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
TrackJS, Request Metrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrackJS, Request Metrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free service offering remote JavaScript debugging tools.
  2. Strong branding association with TrackJS, a known JavaScript error monitoring company.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and external services for error and performance monitoring.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No forms present on the homepage; user interaction via JavaScript-generated URLs.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled on domain, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with integration of TrackJS for error monitoring and Request Metrics for performance tracking. It employs external resources such as FontAwesome and Google Fonts for UI styling. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. The domain is registered via NameCheap with a valid creation date and no privacy protection. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of monitoring scripts. No CMS or specific backend platform is identified. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the infrastructure is solid for a small specialized service but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and formalized compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remotejs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remotejs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.