Skip to main content

Security report for remarketstats.com

Demand Insight · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Demand Insight operates a technology platform providing a demand insight dashboard service accessible via a login portal. The business appears to target professional users requiring market or demand analytics, operating since 2012. The website is functional with a basic but professional design, leveraging common web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. The technical infrastructure is moderate with room for modernization, particularly updating legacy JavaScript libraries and improving mobile and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protections but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, and uses an outdated jQuery version which may expose vulnerabilities. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is legitimate and operational but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remarketstats.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche provider of demand insight analytics dashboards, likely operating on a subscription or client login model. The business model focuses on delivering data-driven insights to business users and analysts. The domain age and registration details support a stable and consistent operation since 2012. The absence of public contact information and policies on the login page suggests a controlled access environment, possibly for paying customers only. The technology stack is standard for web applications but uses some outdated components. No visible partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The company branding is moderate but consistent with the Demand Insight name.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF tokens are implemented in forms, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and use of an outdated jQuery version introduce potential vulnerabilities. No public security or incident response policies are found, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. The site uses Sentry for error monitoring, indicating some level of operational security monitoring. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet higher standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  5. Add visible contact information and security incident response channels to build trust.
  6. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features for better user experience.
  7. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Demand Insight
Description
Demand Insight appears to provide a dashboard service related to demand statistics or market data, likely targeting business users who require analytics or market insights.
Key services
Demand Insight Dashboard access, User account login and management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Raven.js (Sentry error tracking), Bootstrap 3.3.7, Select2 3.5.2, htmx 1.7.0, FontAwesome 5.0.8
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https:// remarketstats.com)
  • CSRF protection via csrfmiddlewaretoken in forms
  • Use of Sentry (Raven.js) for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error tracking)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry (Raven.js)
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Demand Insight dashboard service.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on login page.
  3. Site uses standard security practices like CSRF tokens and HTTPS.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are publicly visible on the login page.
  5. Use of older JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML content.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. No social media or external business contact links found.
  9. Branding is moderate with a single logo image referencing Demand Insight.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) or metadata beyond basic HTML meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 1.11.3, Select2, and FontAwesome 5.0.8. The backend is likely Django based on CSRF token usage. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS but without DNSSEC enabled. Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for libraries. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility optimizations and uses some outdated libraries that pose security risks. The login form is standard with CSRF protection but no advanced security features like multi-factor authentication visible. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved frontend optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remarketstats.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remarketstats.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.