Skip to main content

Security report for redtiger.com

Red Tiger · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Red Tiger is a well-established gaming software provider specializing in casino games and marketing tools for casino operators. The company is part of Evolution Gaming, a major player in the online gaming industry. Their website demonstrates a strong market position with a focus on innovative bonusing tools, tournaments, and jackpot offerings. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear information about their products and services. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, proper domain registration locks, and multiple regulatory certifications displayed. Privacy compliance is evident with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with high trustworthiness and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redtiger.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets casino operators and online gaming players, operating primarily in the technology sector focused on gaming software. Their business model is B2B, providing games and marketing tools to operators. The domain age and registrant information align with a long-standing business. Partnerships with Evolution Gaming and Playin.com enhance their ecosystem. The website content and certifications indicate compliance with multiple gambling regulators, supporting their credibility. The company leverages social media extensively for brand presence. No direct sales or contact phone numbers are provided, indicating a focus on digital engagement and client portals.

Security posture

Red Tiger's website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers, indicating good security hygiene. Domain registration includes multiple prohibitive statuses to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure program is evident. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced with formalized incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone numbers and physical address to improve contact options.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Red Tiger
Description
Red Tiger is a gaming company that builds casino games and provides marketing and promotional tools to casino operators. They offer a suite of products including Smart Spins, Tournaments, and Jackpots to enhance player engagement.
Key services
Casino game development, Bonusing tools, Tournaments, Jackpot management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Cloudflare DNS, CSS3, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status prohibiting unauthorized transfers and deletions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.
  2. Clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  3. Contact email provided in footer: enquiries@redtiger.com
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on multiple platforms including LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter (X), Behance, and ArtStation.
  6. No visible forms for direct contact; contact is via email link.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. Multiple regulatory certifications displayed, indicating compliance with gambling regulations.
  9. Modern web technologies used with good performance and mobile optimization.
  10. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Vue.js and Nuxt.js) with modular scripts and CSS. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, contributing to fast load times and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or headless approach. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to further improve DNS security and formalize security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redtiger.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redtiger.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.