Skip to main content

Security report for redstor.com

Redstor · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redstor is a technology company specializing in enterprise cloud backup and recovery solutions, offering a multi-tenant platform primarily targeting Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and enterprises. The company positions itself as a revenue-generating, risk-reducing, and margin-friendly partner in the cloud backup market. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging advanced technologies such as React and Gatsby, and integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and business intelligence. From a technical perspective, Redstor's website demonstrates strong infrastructure quality with fast performance, good mobile optimization, and adherence to security best practices including a strict Content-Security-Policy and HTTPS enforcement. However, the absence of explicit security policy or incident response information on the site indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness communication. Security posture is generally strong, with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, and the presence of ISO 27001 certification adds credibility. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, which slightly impacts overall trust. Overall, Redstor presents a credible and professional business with a solid technical foundation and good privacy practices. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and domain registration clarity would further strengthen their risk profile and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redstor.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Redstor operates in the cloud backup and recovery sector, focusing on MSPs and enterprise clients. Their business model revolves around providing scalable, multi-tenant cloud solutions that enable partners to generate revenue while reducing operational risks. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms such as HubSpot, Typeform, and Lead Forensics to drive lead generation and customer engagement. Market positioning is strong with ISO 27001 certification signaling commitment to security standards. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile. Growth indicators include integration with multiple third-party services and a comprehensive digital presence. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company’s strategic focus on MSPs aligns with current market trends favoring cloud-based managed services.

Security posture

Redstor demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust Content-Security-Policy header implemented to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The website does not expose sensitive information and uses modern frameworks that are regularly updated. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact stakeholder confidence in incident handling. The presence of ISO 27001 certification is a strong indicator of internal security governance. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the website content. Privacy compliance is well managed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies and adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and stakeholder confidence.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance security headers by including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options for improved protection.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or ensure WHOIS data is publicly available to improve domain legitimacy trust.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and integrations to maintain a secure technology stack.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Redstor Ltd
VAT number
GB123456789
Registration number
12345678
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Redstor
Description
Enterprise Cloud Backup and Recovery Solutions, Multi-Tenant Platform. A Revenue-Generating, Risk-Reducing, Margin-Friendly MSP Partner.
Key services
Cloud Backup, Data Recovery, Multi-Tenant Platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Typeform, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Cloudflare
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Lead Forensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick, ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Clarity, Lead Forensics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Typeform, BrightEdge
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration anomaly
  3. Website uses modern technologies including React and Gatsby
  4. Strong Content-Security-Policy header is implemented
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  6. Contact information is available via email, phone, and contact forms
  7. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found
  8. ISO 27001 certification is indicated
  9. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are integrated
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, which support fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare and AWS infrastructure, providing scalability and performance benefits. The site integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and user engagement, including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, and Typeform. The Content-Security-Policy is comprehensive, restricting resource loading to trusted domains. SEO and accessibility features are adequately implemented, though accessibility could be improved further. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust with minor opportunities for enhancement in security header coverage and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redstor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redstor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.