Skip to main content

Security report for redirect.pizza

Enflow B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

redirect.pizza is a specialized SaaS provider offering domain redirection services with full HTTPS support and API integration. Founded in 2018 and based in the Netherlands, the company targets businesses and individuals seeking hassle-free domain redirects without hosting burdens. Their global edge network ensures fast and reliable redirects worldwide. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive service descriptions. Technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, analytics, and a global CDN-like network for performance and scalability. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy is published. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking a cookie consent mechanism but providing a clear privacy policy and contact information. Overall, redirect.pizza presents a trustworthy and professional service with room for minor improvements in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redirect.pizza

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention redirect.pizza, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
77
Employees
0
Customers
77
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for redirect.pizza.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on domain management and redirection services. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, serving a global clientele including notable brands. Competitive advantages include automatic HTTPS provisioning, API automation, detailed analytics, and a robust global edge network. The company maintains strong customer trust evidenced by high ratings and testimonials. Partnerships and integrations with analytics and chat platforms enhance customer engagement and service quality. Growth indicators include a broad client base and continuous feature expansion. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and publishing security policies to strengthen market position.

Security posture

redirect.pizza exhibits a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforced across all redirects and domain transfer lock enabled. The use of Content Security Policy nonces and modern security headers is implied, though explicit headers were not fully enumerated. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and contact information, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a gap. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published security contacts or policies. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized vulnerability disclosure and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy impact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Enflow B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enflow B.V.
Description
redirect.pizza is a domain redirect service that offers hassle-free domain redirection without the burden of hosting. They provide full HTTPS support and API compatibility, allowing users to enter domain names and have redirects managed seamlessly.
Key services
Domain redirection, Automatic HTTPS (SSL certificates), API for automation, Analytics for traffic insights, Email forwarding
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, SVG icons, CSS (Foundation framework), ProfitWell (subscription analytics), Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crisp Chat
Frameworks
Foundation CSS, Alpine.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Use of CSP nonce for inline scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, ProfitWell, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, ProfitWell
Marketing tools
ProfitWell, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS provider for domain redirection services.
  2. Strong focus on HTTPS and security in service offering.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Global edge network with multiple POPs for fast redirects.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, which is a minor compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact published.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  8. Clear contact information including email and physical address.
  9. High customer satisfaction indicated by 5-star rating and testimonials.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including Alpine.js and Foundation CSS framework, ensuring responsive and accessible design. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, ProfitWell, and LinkedIn Insight. The global edge network with multiple POPs supports low latency and high availability for redirects. Performance is optimized with preloading and module scripts. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Opportunities exist to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redirect.pizza. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redirect.pizza.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.