Skip to main content

Security report for redi-school.org

ReDI School · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ReDI School is a non-profit organization focused on providing free technology education through a variety of courses including web development, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and AI. The organization targets diverse audiences including women, kids, and teens, and offers career support services to help students transition into the tech industry. The website is built on Squarespace, featuring a modern and responsive design with clear navigation and multiple location-specific pages across Europe. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though some advanced security headers and policies are missing. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent banner but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is common for non-profits. Overall, the site demonstrates good professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redi-school.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention redi-school.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
99
Employees
2
Customers
38
Third parties
59
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-06-04 · 10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for redi-school.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –talent-pool.redi-school.org2026-06-04
  • –bbb.redi-school.org2026-05-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ReDI School operates in the education and technology sectors as a medium-sized non-profit organization. Its business model relies on free course offerings funded by donations and supported by partnerships. The organization has a strong market position in Europe with multiple campuses and a focus on diversity and inclusion. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with integration of donation platforms and job listing services, indicating a mature partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active social media channels and career support initiatives. The lack of explicit business registration details on the site is typical for non-profits but could be improved for transparency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and HSTS headers, protecting data in transit. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the absence of a detailed privacy policy and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The site does not publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, limiting external security engagement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency.
  4. Consider providing verified contact emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ReDI School
Description
ReDI School provides free technology education by industry experts, offering courses in web development, user-centered design, cloud computing, cybersecurity, data analytics, AI, and programs for kids, teens, and women. It also offers career support and has multiple locations in Europe.
Key services
Free tech education courses, Career support services, Volunteer opportunities, Community and diversity initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, ShareThis
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form available
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  5. Uses Squarespace CMS with standard scripts and tracking
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected or registry issue
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging its CMS capabilities and hosting infrastructure. It uses common web technologies including jQuery and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and ShareThis for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data but could be enhanced with more comprehensive structured data and content optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, suitable for the organization's needs, though some technical debt may exist due to reliance on third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redi-school.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redi-school.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.