Skip to main content

Security report for reaper.is

Technology · India

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website reaper.is is a personal portfolio site of a seasoned developer from India with over 8 years of experience in web development, tooling, automation, and parsers. The site emphasizes open source contributions and simplicity in design and content. The target audience is primarily developers and open source enthusiasts. The business model is individual personal branding and showcasing projects rather than commercial services. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Highlight.js for code syntax highlighting. External dependencies are minimal and performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or policies, and no HTTPS status provided in the data. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or incident response information is available, limiting compliance and transparency. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the website content and shows a legitimate registration without privacy protection. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reaper.is

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reaper.is, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reaper.is right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate reaper.is and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • re•••.per.isLowsubdomain
  • re•••.er.isLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of reaper.is with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site represents an individual developer's personal brand rather than a corporate entity. Market positioning is as a technology professional and open source contributor. The business model is informational and portfolio-based without direct revenue streams or partnerships evident. The target customer segment is developers and programmers interested in open source projects and tooling. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include ongoing open source contributions and a clear focus on simplicity and efficiency. The site does not engage in advertising or analytics tracking, indicating a privacy-conscious approach.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in best practices. No forms or data collection reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder trust in case of security events. The site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), which is mandatory for security. No vulnerable libraries detected in the scripts used. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide contact information including an email address and incident response contacts for transparency and support.
  5. Regularly review and update dependencies and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Seasoned developer from India with over 8 years of experience specializing in Web Development, Tooling, Automation, and Parsers. Passionate about experimenting with diverse programming languages and exploring new domains. Builds open source projects focusing on simplicity and efficiency.
Key services
Web Development, Tooling, Automation, Open Source Projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Highlight.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal developer portfolio focused on open source and programming.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Uses Highlight.js for code syntax highlighting.
  6. Minimal external dependencies from unpkg.com and esm.sh.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and not privacy protected.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, modern HTML5 and CSS3, using JavaScript primarily for UI enhancements such as syntax highlighting with Highlight.js. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs (unpkg.com, esm.sh). The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. No CMS or complex frameworks detected, indicating a lightweight and maintainable codebase. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or structured data found. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which benefits privacy but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reaper.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reaper.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.