Skip to main content

Security report for realcomtechies.com

Realcom Technologies Limited · Technology · Nigeria

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Realcom Technologies Limited is a Nigerian ICT company established in 1999, providing a wide range of technology solutions and services to businesses. Their offerings include PC systems, network infrastructure, security systems, IT outsourcing, and training services. The company positions itself as a reliable and experienced IT partner with a strong client base and partnerships with major technology vendors. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions and client testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins and frameworks such as Visual Composer and Revolution Slider. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and appears to employ Wordfence security measures, but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the active and professional website presence. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Privacy and terms of service pages exist but lack comprehensive GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, Realcom Technologies demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but should address domain registration transparency, enhance privacy compliance, and improve security headers to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realcomtechies.com

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Realcom Technologies operates in the Nigerian ICT sector with a B2B business model focused on delivering technology solutions and services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence since 1999, a broad portfolio of ICT services, and partnerships with leading technology brands. The company targets corporate clients requiring IT infrastructure, security, and support services. Revenue streams likely include product sales, service contracts, and training programs. The website showcases a diverse client base and partner ecosystem, indicating strong market integration. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for growth through enhanced digital marketing, compliance improvements, and domain legitimacy verification.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and implied use of Wordfence security plugin. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published incident response policy or security.txt file indicates limited transparency in vulnerability management. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism present. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden website security.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent banner to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and legitimacy of domain registration.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Realcom Technologies Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Realcom Technologies Limited
Description
Since 1999, Realcom Technologies has been providing ICT services to the business community in Nigeria. They offer a broad range of ICT solutions including PC systems, servers, network systems, surveillance, fire suppression, IT outsourcing, and training services.
Key services
PC Systems & Servers, Corporate Internet Provisioning, Unified Threat Management, IT Support Services, IT Outsourcing Services, IT Training Services, Network Systems, Surveillance Systems, Power Systems, Access Control Systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Revolution Slider, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Wordfence security plugin (implied by script)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found, but terms of use page exists
  6. Use of common WordPress plugins and themes
  7. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  8. Good branding and client/partner logos displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of popular plugins such as LayerSlider, Revolution Slider, and Visual Composer for content management and presentation. The technology stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome for UI components and styling. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in SEO and accessibility. The site is mobile responsive and provides a good user experience with clear navigation. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced further by updating to newer versions of WordPress and plugins and implementing modern security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realcomtechies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realcomtechies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.