Skip to main content

Security report for readsoft.com

Tungsten Automation Corporation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tungsten Automation, formerly known as Kofax, is a leading enterprise software company specializing in AI-powered workflow automation solutions. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of products including intelligent document processing, robotic process automation, invoice capture, print management, and PDF/eSignature solutions. Positioned as a market leader, Tungsten Automation serves a global audience with a focus on enhancing operational efficiency and compliance across various industries such as finance, healthcare, and supply chain. The website reflects a mature digital presence with consistent branding and extensive content tailored to enterprise customers. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Sitecore CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and advanced analytics tools like Visual Website Optimizer and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, supporting a positive user experience. The integration of multiple third-party services is managed carefully to maintain compliance and performance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs privacy compliance mechanisms including GDPR-aligned cookie consent. However, explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response pages are not evident, suggesting areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, Tungsten Automation's website presents a professional, secure, and compliant digital front that aligns with its enterprise market positioning. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and direct contact information could further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching readsoft.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
75
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tungsten Automation operates as an essential entity in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven workflow automation for large enterprises. The company has a strong market position supported by industry recognitions and a broad partner ecosystem. Its business model centers on providing software solutions and professional services that streamline complex business processes. The website content highlights a diverse product suite addressing multiple industry verticals and use cases, indicating a comprehensive approach to market needs. The presence of extensive resources, customer case studies, and partner programs reflects a mature and growth-oriented business strategy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is evident, with no signs of vulnerable or outdated libraries in the provided content. However, the absence of explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response information suggests potential gaps in security transparency and incident readiness. No direct contact channels for security issues were found, which could impact incident response effectiveness. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could benefit from enhanced visibility and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and maintain a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  4. Provide direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to facilitate user and security communications.
  5. Enhance data protection practices by documenting data retention policies and ensuring all compliance requirements (e.g., NIS2) are met.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tungsten Automation Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tungsten Automation Corporation
Description
Tungsten Automation, formerly Kofax, is a leading provider of AI-powered workflow automation solutions for global enterprises. Streamline your processes and boost efficiency.
Key services
AI-powered workflow automation, Invoice capture and e-invoicing, Print management, PDF and eSignature solutions, Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Vidyard video player, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), OneTrust Cookie Consent, Sitecore Experience Forms
Frameworks
Sitecore CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and external links)
  • Cookie consent and privacy compliance
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
VWO, Reddit Pixel, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a rebranded version of Kofax as Tungsten Automation
  2. Comprehensive product and industry coverage
  3. Strong emphasis on AI-powered workflow automation
  4. Multiple language versions available (en, de, fr)
  5. Use of advanced analytics and A/B testing tools
  6. Cookie consent and privacy compliance implemented
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only forms
  8. No explicit security or incident response pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure using Sitecore CMS, enhanced with modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and video integration via Vidyard. It employs Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and A/B testing, indicating a data-driven approach to user experience optimization. The presence of OneTrust for cookie consent demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses advanced event tracking and session management techniques, reflecting a mature digital marketing and analytics setup. Opportunities exist to improve performance by optimizing script loading and reducing third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with readsoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review readsoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.