Skip to main content

Security report for reachmee.com

Talentech · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Talentech operates a mature and comprehensive recruitment and HR SaaS platform targeting growing companies and public sector organizations primarily in Sweden and the Nordic region. The platform offers integrated recruitment, onboarding, HR management, and AI-driven decision support services, positioning itself as a top-ranked solution with a large user base and extensive customer testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common SEO and performance plugins, but suffers from a critical lack of a valid SSL certificate and slow page load times, which negatively impact security and user experience. Privacy policies and GDPR compliance are well addressed, with clear cookie and terms of service pages. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and consistency. Overall, while the business and content quality are strong, the security posture requires urgent improvement to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reachmee.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Talentech's market positioning as a leading HR technology provider is supported by its extensive customer base and product suite. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on delivering an all-in-one platform that simplifies HR processes and enhances decision-making through AI. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem, including marketplaces and developer portals, to extend its platform capabilities. Growth indicators include multi-language support and a strong presence in Nordic countries. The company emphasizes customer success and local support, which are key competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription packages and service tiers. Strategic observations suggest a focus on scalability, integration flexibility, and user-friendly design to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No modern TLS protocols or security headers like HSTS are enabled, further weakening the security posture. While SPF records are configured for email protection and no subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found, the lack of encrypted transport is a critical gap. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through policy pages, but incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential loss of user trust, regulatory penalties, and increased risk of data breaches. Security culture indicators are limited by the absence of explicit security or incident response information on the site.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across all site pages immediately.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to secure communications.
  3. Deploy HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Activate OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  6. Optimize website performance to reduce load times, improving user experience and SEO rankings.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance enhancements. The tech stack includes jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components, and Google Tag Manager and Google Optimize for analytics and marketing optimization. Hosting is provided via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure. Despite modern technologies, the site suffers from slow load times (over 25 seconds) and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant technical debt. Accessibility features are basic, and mobile optimization is good but could be improved. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, supporting SEO and multi-language content delivery. Technical risks include potential data interception due to missing HTTPS and performance issues that may affect user retention.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reachmee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reachmee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.