Skip to main content

Security report for rcl-group.com

RCL Group · Technology · Slovenia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RCL Group is a medium-sized technology company based in Slovenia, specializing in business information systems tailored for various industries including retail, automotive, publishing, and business intelligence. With over 30 years of experience and a presence in multiple European countries, they offer integrated ERP solutions such as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central alongside proprietary software suites like cBBIS and cDMS. Their business model focuses on B2B software solutions and system integration, targeting companies seeking comprehensive management systems. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap, and Chart.js, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and basic accessibility features. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, some security best practices such as security headers and explicit incident response information are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and protects forms with reCAPTCHA, but lacks published security policies and vulnerability disclosure channels. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business references support its authenticity. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional transparency and technical controls. The overall risk assessment suggests a trustworthy and professional business website with minor gaps in security transparency and domain registration data. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rcl-group.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RCL Group holds a strong market position as a regional provider of ERP and business management software solutions, leveraging partnerships such as Microsoft Gold Partner status. Their competitive advantage lies in offering tailored solutions across multiple sectors including retail, automotive, and publishing, supported by a broad portfolio of over 300 projects and a skilled team of 80+ experts. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, implementation services, and ongoing support. The company targets medium to large enterprises requiring integrated business systems. Their partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft, LS Central, and various regional subsidiaries, enabling geographic expansion and localized service delivery. Strategic observations highlight a focus on digital transformation and business process optimization for clients, with opportunities to enhance security transparency and domain legitimacy to further solidify market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and form protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce overall security transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external reporting channels. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable compliance gap, potentially impacting trust. Data protection practices appear adequate for web forms, but no explicit Data Protection Officer contact or detailed GDPR compliance statements are found. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels. Overall, the security culture is present but could benefit from formalized policies and improved domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data inconsistencies to align domain registration information with business claims and improve legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rcl Int d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RCL Group
Description
RCL Group provides business information systems for various types of businesses, focusing on retail, automotive services, document management, publishing, and business intelligence solutions. They offer integrated ERP solutions including Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and specialized software suites like cBBIS, cDMS, cDOCS, cPRESS, and cBI.
Key services
Retail and wholesale management software (cBBIS, LS Central), Automotive service and sales management (cDMS), Document management system (cDOCS), Publishing and distribution management (cPRESS), Business intelligence and reporting (cBI), Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central ERP solutions, Shopsy - tax cash register and retail system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Chart.js, Bootstrap CSS framework, Font Awesome icons, Google Fonts (Cabin)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting B2B clients in ERP and retail software.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple countries.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
  10. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, Font Awesome for icons, and Chart.js for data visualization. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, with reCAPTCHA protecting forms against spam. The CMS appears to be BCMS, supporting multilingual content and form management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear with dropdown menus and a side menu for smaller screens. Technical debt is minimal, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rcl-group.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rcl-group.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.