Skip to main content

Security report for rcdp.lv

Rīgas Centra daiļamatniecības pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Centra daiļamatniecības pamatskola is a small educational institution based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in primary arts and crafts education. Founded in 1992, it operates from a historically significant building that has served as an artisan school since the 19th century. The website serves as an informational portal for students, parents, and educators, providing school details, documentation, history, and news updates. The site is built on WordPress using the Sydney theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with standard web technologies and responsive design. From a security perspective, the website employs a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or incident response policies published on the site. The absence of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage limits direct communication channels. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but could benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer contact information. The risk assessment is moderate; the site does not show signs of malicious activity or vulnerabilities but lacks some security best practices and transparency in incident response. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, enforcing HTTPS, publishing security policies, and improving contact visibility to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rcdp.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution occupies a niche in the education sector focused on arts and crafts in Latvia, targeting local students and their families. Its market position is that of a specialized, historically rooted school with a stable presence since 1992. The business model is non-commercial, centered on educational service delivery. The website supports this by providing relevant information and resources. There is no indication of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. The site links externally only to an educational platform (E-Klase) and the theme provider, suggesting limited external dependencies. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not discernible from the site content. The partnership ecosystem appears minimal, focused on educational tools and resources.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with GDPR-compliant cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. The absence of visible contact channels for security incidents and lack of WHOIS transparency are gaps. The WordPress platform and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate common vulnerabilities. No signs of exposed sensitive data or malicious scripts were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but could be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with a strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add clear and verified contact emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce vulnerability risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Centra daiļamatniecības pamatskola
Description
Rīgas Centra daiļamatniecības pamatskola is an educational institution founded in 1992, located at Aspazijas bulvāris 34, Riga. It operates in a historic building that has been an artisan school since 1872.
Key services
Primary education in arts and crafts, School documentation and history information, Parent resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS, Sydney WordPress theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational institution site in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with some English metadata.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. Site uses Sydney theme and standard WordPress plugins.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with the Sydney theme and uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Bootstrap CSS for styling and responsiveness. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with no obvious broken elements. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond cookie consent are present, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The site uses standard WordPress plugins for cookie law compliance. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security and SEO features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rcdp.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rcdp.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.