Skip to main content

Security report for rawventures.com

Raw Ventures · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raw Ventures is a venture capital firm investing in companies that combine transformational technology with strong business models. Their focus spans multiple industries including agrotech, biotech, medtech, mediatech, and fintech. The firm supports companies and founders through multiple funding rounds, emphasizing long-term partnerships and strategic operational support. The website reflects a global investment reach, highlighting portfolio companies and press coverage, targeting founders and investors interested in innovative technology-driven businesses. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies, optimized for performance and mobile devices, and includes privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness, but the professional presentation and external references support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, content-rich, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security transparency and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rawventures.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raw Ventures positions itself as a global venture capital investor with a diversified portfolio across technology sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in combining capital with strategic and operational support, fostering innovation from seed to global business scale. The business model is centered on long-term engagement with startups, focusing on companies with innovative tech and sound fundamentals. Revenue streams likely come from investment returns and portfolio growth. The target customers are startup founders and co-investors. Growth indicators include active portfolio updates and press presence. Partnerships include media and development agencies. The company maintains a professional digital presence but lacks detailed corporate registration information publicly. Strategic observations suggest a focus on emerging tech hubs and cross-industry innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security score. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site does not provide a dedicated security contact or policy page, limiting incident reporting options. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide a dedicated security contact email to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration information or use a verified WHOIS service to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raw Ventures
Description
We invest in companies that combine transformational technology with strong business models. We like to support companies and founders over multiple funding rounds.
Key services
Investment capital, Strategic and operational support, Long-term partnership through multiple funding rounds
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Inter), Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding throughout the site.
  3. Clear focus on venture capital investments in technology and innovation.
  4. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness slightly.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow).
  10. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosting, leveraging modern web fonts (Google Fonts Inter) and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility standards. Cookie consent is managed via Finsweet Cookie Consent script with opt-in mode. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site uses CDN for static assets, improving performance and reliability. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is missing, representing a modernization opportunity. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant user experience with minor improvements recommended for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rawventures.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rawventures.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.