Skip to main content

Security report for rawtext.club

1&1 Internet Inc · Technology · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

rawtext.club is a niche community-driven technology service focused on providing shell access, local email, and hosting for alternative internet protocols such as gemini and gopher. The website emphasizes a slow and deliberate development approach, fostering a community governed by a social contract. The business operates under the domain registered to 1&1 Internet Inc, a reputable US-based hosting provider, with the domain created in 2018 and currently active. Technically, the website is minimalistic, built with basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS. It lacks mobile optimization and SEO best practices, resulting in a slow and basic user experience. No analytics or advertising tools are present, indicating a privacy-conscious or low-budget operation. Security measures are limited; DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain registration and hosting provider but not explicitly confirmed), but lacks advanced security configurations. There are no privacy or cookie policies, which reduces compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business, enhancing trustworthiness. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, rawtext.club is a small, community-focused technology service with basic technical and security maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, privacy compliance, and mobile optimization would enhance its security posture and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rawtext.club

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

rawtext.club occupies a niche market serving technology enthusiasts interested in alternative internet protocols and slow internet culture. Its business model centers on community-hosted services including shell access, email, and content hosting. The site is small-scale and deliberately slow-growing, emphasizing community governance through a social contract. Revenue streams and monetization are not evident, suggesting a non-commercial or hobbyist operation. The domain is registered to a well-known hosting provider, 1&1 Internet Inc, which supports legitimacy. The absence of marketing, advertising, or analytics tools indicates limited commercial ambitions. The target audience is specialized and technically savvy, with growth potential dependent on community engagement and service expansion.

Security posture

The security posture of rawtext.club is basic and could be improved. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers via clientTransferProhibited status, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which weakens DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, increasing risk of common web attacks. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, reducing compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking, which reduces privacy risks. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and SEO to enhance accessibility and discoverability.
  5. Establish an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy to strengthen security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
1&1 Internet Inc
Description
rawtext.club is a community-oriented technology service offering shell access, local email, and hosting for gemini, gopher, and html content. It emphasizes a slow, deliberate development approach and a social contract for community governance.
Key services
shell access, local email, hosting of gemini, gopher, and html content, local chat program (gab)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, monospace font
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small community-focused service with limited current offerings.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating low compliance maturity.
  3. Technical implementation is minimal with basic HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS.
  4. No analytics or advertising detected, indicating minimal tracking and marketing.
  5. Security posture is weak due to lack of DNSSEC and security headers.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business model.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. Mobile optimization and SEO are poor, limiting accessibility and discoverability.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and CSS, using monospace fonts and a fixed width layout, indicating a simple and possibly legacy design approach. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Hosting is provided by IONOS SE / 1&1 Internet Inc, a reputable provider. Performance is likely slow due to lack of optimization and mobile responsiveness is poor. SEO is minimal with no meta tags or structured data present. No analytics or advertising scripts are included, suggesting low technical complexity and limited tracking. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, SEO enhancements, and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rawtext.club. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rawtext.club.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.