Skip to main content

Security report for ravenjs.com

Sentry · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ravenjs.com serves as an informational page for Sentry's legacy JavaScript SDK, Raven.js, which facilitates browser-based error tracking. The site primarily targets software developers and teams seeking to monitor JavaScript errors in real time. It positions itself as a legacy product with a recommendation to use the newer @sentry/browser SDK, reflecting a mature product lifecycle. The business behind the SDK is Sentry, a recognized player in the error tracking and monitoring space, with the domain registration dating back to 2013, consistent with the product's history. Technically, the site employs a simple stack including Bootstrap 3, jQuery 2.0.3, and Google Analytics for tracking. The hosting appears to be managed via DNSimple, with no CMS detected. The site is basic in design and mobile optimization, with moderate performance and accessibility. There is no evidence of advanced SEO or modern frontend frameworks. Security-wise, the site lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could pose vulnerabilities. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC, and SSL configuration details are not provided. From a security posture perspective, the site does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it offer contact or incident response information. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent mechanisms, indicating poor privacy compliance. No security policies or certifications are disclosed. The WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no privacy protection, aligning with the business profile. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness and several areas for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, updating legacy libraries, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ravenjs.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ravenjs.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ravenjs.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ravenjs.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raven.js is positioned as a legacy JavaScript SDK for Sentry's error tracking platform, targeting developers needing browser error monitoring. The business model is open source with commercial backing by Sentry, a known entity in software error monitoring. The site content is minimal and focused on technical users, with no direct sales or contact channels. The domain age and registration status support a stable business presence. The lack of contact info and policies suggests the site is primarily informational rather than transactional. The partnership ecosystem includes GitHub and Sentry.io links, indicating integration with broader developer tools. Growth indicators are limited due to legacy status, with a clear push towards newer SDKs. The site serves as a legacy resource rather than a primary business front.

Security posture

The security maturity of the site is basic. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces resilience against DNS and web-based attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating gaps in compliance and readiness. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers but lacks advanced DNS security. Google Analytics is implemented without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. Overall, the site would benefit from modern security best practices and compliance enhancements to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Upgrade legacy JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to supported secure versions.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and implement cookie consent mechanisms.
  5. Add contact information and a security incident response policy or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sentry
Description
Raven.js is the legacy browser JavaScript SDK for Sentry, an open source error tracking platform that helps development teams monitor and fix crashes in real time.
Key services
JavaScript error tracking, Real-time crash reporting, Integration plugins for various JS frameworks
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 2.0.3, Bootstrap 3.0.0, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple informational page for a legacy JavaScript SDK.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. Uses legacy JavaScript libraries and Bootstrap 3.
  5. Includes Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in HTML.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and consistent with business age.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 2.0.3, which is outdated and may pose security risks. Hosting is managed via DNSimple, with no CMS detected. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is minimal with no meta tags beyond the title. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy controls. The site is static and informational, with no forms or dynamic content. Technical debt is evident in legacy libraries and lack of modern security features. Opportunities exist to modernize the frontend stack, improve security headers, and enhance privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ravenjs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravenjs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.