Skip to main content

Security report for ravenjs.com

Sentry · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ravenjs.com serves as a legacy informational page for Raven.js, the browser JavaScript SDK for Sentry, a popular open source error tracking platform. It provides technical details about the SDK, including plugins and download links, targeting developers and development teams who use JavaScript in browser environments. The site positions itself as a legacy resource, recommending newer SDKs for new projects. The business behind the product is Sentry, a recognized player in the error monitoring market, with a medium-sized footprint in the technology sector. Technically, the site uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap, indicating legacy status, and includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but DNS is managed via dnsimple.com. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. No CMS is detected, and the site appears to be a simple static or lightly dynamic page. From a security perspective, the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration history consistent with the product's age. However, the site lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and security best practices. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and user trust. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and informative for its niche audience but falls short in privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ravenjs.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ravenjs.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ravenjs.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raven.js is positioned as a legacy JavaScript SDK for Sentry, targeting developers needing browser error tracking. The business model is open source with commercial SaaS offerings via Sentry.io. The site supports the product with documentation and download links but does not engage in direct sales or customer support on this domain. Market positioning is as a legacy tool, with clear guidance to use newer SDKs. The partnership ecosystem includes GitHub and CDN providers. The domain age and registration details support a stable, legitimate presence. Growth indicators are limited due to legacy status. No direct revenue streams or contact points are visible on this site, indicating it is primarily informational.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers but lacks DNSSEC. The website does not implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates user tracking but without visible consent mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden the website.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for security issues.
  5. Modernize the technology stack to current versions to reduce technical debt and improve security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sentry
Description
Raven.js is the legacy browser JavaScript SDK for Sentry, an open source error tracking platform that helps development teams monitor and fix crashes in real time.
Key services
JavaScript error tracking, Automatic reporting of uncaught exceptions, Plugins for popular JavaScript frameworks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 2.0.3, Bootstrap 3.0.0, Google Analytics
Platforms
Browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a legacy product page for Raven.js, a JavaScript SDK for Sentry error tracking.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  4. Uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap indicating legacy status.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations visible in HTML.
  7. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy front-end technologies including jQuery 2.0.3 and Bootstrap 3.0.0, which may have known vulnerabilities and lack modern features. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The HTML structure is simple and valid but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed by dnsimple.com. Performance is moderate with no evident optimizations for mobile or accessibility beyond basic styling. The site is static with minimal dynamic content, reducing complexity but also limiting interactivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ravenjs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravenjs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.