Skip to main content

Security report for rarible.org

Rarible · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rarible.org is a technology-focused website offering a fast, multichain NFT API infrastructure service targeting developers and businesses requiring NFT data across Ethereum, Base, Polygon, and other blockchains. The website presents a professional design with good SEO metadata and Open Graph integration, indicating a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure leverages Framer for site generation and Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, ensuring reliable performance and HTTPS security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement in technical security hardening. The security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the lack of published privacy, cookie, and security policies, as well as contact information, limits transparency and compliance confidence. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and reflects a legitimate business with consistent WHOIS registration data. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rarible.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rarible operates in the NFT and blockchain technology sector, providing API services that facilitate access to NFT data across multiple chains. Its business model centers on offering free API keys to attract developers and enterprises, positioning itself as a fast and reliable infrastructure provider. The company is US-based, founded in 2020, aligning with the domain registration date. The website targets a technical audience, primarily developers and businesses in the blockchain ecosystem. While the site lacks explicit contact and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials, its consistent branding and domain registration support its credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The company appears to focus on growth through API adoption and multichain support, which is a competitive advantage in the evolving NFT market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface from user input vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The lack of contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) further limits incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. To improve, the company should implement security best practices, publish relevant policies, and enable DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@rarible.org) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and consider a vulnerability disclosure program to engage the security community and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rarible
Description
Rarible API is the fastest NFT API infrastructure. Access data for Ethereum, Base, Polygon and +10 chains. Get your free API keys now.
Key services
NFT data access, Multichain API support, Free API keys
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (site generator), Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional API service platform for NFT data.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. No forms detected for user input or contact.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information provided.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Site is built with Framer and hosted behind Cloudflare.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping tool, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and CDN services. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and includes well-structured meta tags for SEO and social media sharing. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and the site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. No CMS was detected, indicating a static or custom-built frontend. The absence of forms reduces complexity but also limits user interaction capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rarible.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rarible.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.