Skip to main content

Security report for rapid7.com

Rapid7 · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rapid7 is a leading cybersecurity company specializing in providing a unified security platform that spans from endpoint to cloud. Their offerings include managed detection and response (MDR), vulnerability management, and exposure management solutions designed to help enterprises confidently prevent breaches and manage their attack surface. The company targets security operations teams and enterprises seeking comprehensive cybersecurity solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a modern tech stack including Next.js and React, integrated with advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer. Security best practices are well implemented, including HTTPS enforcement and security headers, contributing to a strong security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear consent mechanisms. Incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, demonstrating transparency and readiness. Overall, the website and business presence indicate a reputable and enterprise-grade cybersecurity provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rapid7.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
90
Email security
77
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rapid7.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,056
Employees
4
Customers
1,977
Third parties
75
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-26 · 41 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rapid7.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –insight.rapid7.com2026-05-26
  • –insight.rapid7.com2026-05-25
  • –rapid7.com2025-07-20
  • –insight.rapid7.com2025-06-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rapid7 operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity services. Their business model is B2B, offering software and managed security services to enterprises. The company holds recognized certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, enhancing their market credibility. Their target customers are security operations teams and organizations requiring advanced security solutions. Rapid7 maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages partnerships and subdomains to extend their service offerings. The company’s digital marketing strategy includes the use of multiple analytics and optimization tools, reflecting a data-driven approach. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor anomaly but does not detract from their established market position and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of secure forms with consent mechanisms aligns with privacy regulations. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the scripts analyzed. Incident response contacts are clearly provided, and a vulnerability disclosure policy is published, indicating a mature security culture. The lack of WHOIS transparency is noted but likely due to privacy protection rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity level is high with no critical vulnerabilities identified.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain regular updates of third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  2. Consider publishing more detailed security posture information and incident response procedures on the website.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Expect-CT to enhance SSL/TLS security.
  4. Increase transparency around data retention policies to improve privacy compliance visibility.
  5. Continue enhancing user trust by showcasing certifications and compliance achievements prominently.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rapid7
Description
Rapid7 provides a unified cybersecurity platform from endpoint to cloud, offering managed detection and response, vulnerability management, and exposure management solutions.
Key services
Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Vulnerability Management, Exposure Management, Cybersecurity Platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Analytics, Bing Ads, Cookielaw.org Consent Management
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer, Cookielaw.org Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on cybersecurity services.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No adult or questionable content detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or protected, which is unusual but not uncommon for enterprise domains.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  8. Multiple social media and external links to reputable domains.
  9. Clear contact information and incident response contacts available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering for performance optimization. It uses advanced analytics and A/B testing tools such as Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and Bing Ads for marketing and user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of critical assets and asynchronous script loading. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available but the infrastructure appears robust. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities for further modernization including enhanced accessibility and SEO refinements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rapid7.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rapid7.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.