Skip to main content

Security report for rangeforce.com

RangeForce · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RangeForce is a cybersecurity training platform specializing in cloud-based cyber ranges and solo labs designed to empower security operations centers (SOCs) and threat hunters. The company positions itself as a provider of realistic, team-focused training environments that use real tools and networks to close technical and soft skills gaps. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content targeting enterprise security teams. Technically, the site leverages HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, and modern JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and engaging user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit security headers slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, RangeForce presents as a credible and professional cybersecurity training provider with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rangeforce.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rangeforce.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
651
Employees
0
Customers
651
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

22 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rangeforce.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RangeForce operates in the technology sector, focusing on cybersecurity training for enterprise clients globally. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering subscription-based access to cloud-hosted cyber ranges and training labs. The presence of major customer logos such as Barclays, BBC, and Equifax indicates strong market penetration and trust. The company emphasizes continuous skills development, team readiness, and alignment with industry frameworks like NIST and MITRE. Marketing efforts are supported by HubSpot tools and Google Ads, targeting security professionals and organizations seeking to enhance their defensive capabilities. The lack of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a lead generation approach primarily via web forms. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, enhancing privacy protections. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is provided, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The WHOIS data is missing, which may raise concerns about domain transparency but does not directly indicate malicious intent. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing a security policy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Review WHOIS registration details to ensure domain transparency and reduce suspicion from missing data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RangeForce
Description
RangeForce provides a cloud-based cyber range and solo labs to empower SOCs and threat hunters with soft and technical skills.
Key services
Cloud-based cyber range, Team exercises, Solo labs, Skills gap analysis, Personalized learning plans
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot CMS and marketing tools, jQuery, Slick carousel, Fancybox, WOW.js animations, Google Fonts
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on cybersecurity training with emphasis on team readiness and real-world tools.
  3. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools indicates mature digital marketing practices.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via forms.
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or protected, which is a moderate trust concern.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick carousel, and WOW.js for animations. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics along with HubSpot Analytics provide user tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and accessibility features, though accessibility could be further improved. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rangeforce.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rangeforce.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.