Skip to main content

Security report for raeco.lv

SIA Raeco · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Raeco is a small Latvian company specializing in video surveillance system installation and maintenance, SAT and TV equipment services, and IT solutions including website development. The company targets businesses and private property owners primarily in Tukums, Latvia, positioning itself as a local provider of security and IT services. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content relevance, reflecting a consistent brand image and moderate trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses a mix of older and modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery 1.8.3, and Google Analytics, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of visible security headers present security concerns. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by updating libraries, adding security headers, and implementing privacy policies. The domain WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain registration details. Contact information is clearly provided, including phone, email, physical addresses, and social media presence on Facebook.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raeco.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raeco operates in the technology sector with a focus on security and IT services. Its business model revolves around providing installation and maintenance services for video surveillance and related equipment, alongside IT solutions such as website development and hosting. The company leverages client partnerships, as evidenced by featured client websites, to showcase its capabilities. The target market includes local businesses and private homeowners seeking enhanced security and digital presence. The company has been registered since 2011, indicating a stable presence in the regional market. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts, equipment sales, and IT support. The partnership ecosystem includes client websites developed by Raeco, suggesting a service-oriented growth strategy. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced compliance and security measures to maintain competitive advantage and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) is a notable risk, as older libraries often contain unpatched vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security contact channels. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no visible anti-CSRF tokens or advanced input validation on forms. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards. Overall, the site is functional but requires updates to align with modern security best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Introduce visible security and incident response policies, including dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RAECO SIA
VAT number
LV40103395036
Registration number
40103395036
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Raeco
Description
SIA Raeco provides full-service video surveillance system installation and maintenance, SAT and TV equipment services, and IT solutions including website development and hosting.
Key services
Videonovērošanas sistēmas (Video surveillance systems), SAT un TV iekārtas (SAT and TV equipment), IT risinājumi (IT solutions including website development)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Bootstrap CSS and JS, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Lato, Dosis), Isotope.js, WOW.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://raeco.lv/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical addresses.
  4. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  6. Business information including registration number and VAT number is displayed in footer.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography, indicating a modern front-end approach. However, the reliance on an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) introduces technical debt and security risks. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics scripts improving page load times. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is supported by meta description and keywords, but no structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) is present to enhance search engine understanding. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but would benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raeco.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raeco.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.