Skip to main content

Security report for radioeng.cz

Radioengineering Society · Education · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radioengineering is an established academic journal focused on wireless communication and related technologies, publishing original research since 1992. It operates as an open access journal affiliated with Czech and Slovak Technical Universities and the IEEE Communications Society, with indexing in major scientific databases. The journal targets researchers and academics in the field of radioengineering and wireless technologies, offering peer-reviewed papers and special issues on emerging topics. The business model includes mandatory publication fees for authors and incentives for reviewers. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL), but no security headers are detected. There is no explicit privacy or cookie policy, which impacts privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Contact information is limited to email addresses with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional for its academic purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers, explicit privacy and cookie policies, and improved mobile and accessibility features to strengthen compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radioeng.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radioengineering holds a niche position as a specialized academic journal in wireless communication technology, leveraging its long history and indexing in reputable databases to maintain credibility. Its open access model with publication fees aligns with modern academic publishing trends. The journal's partnership with IEEE Communications Society and presence on social media platforms enhance its visibility. The business operates primarily in the education and technology sectors, targeting researchers and technical universities. Growth opportunities include expanding special issues and improving digital presence. The lack of detailed WHOIS data slightly reduces transparency but does not detract from the journal's established reputation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap with GDPR and related regulations. No signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site uses minimal third-party tracking limited to toplist.cz. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and formalizing privacy compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden user reach and comply with accessibility standards.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radioengineering Society
Description
Radioengineering Journal publishes original scientific and engineering papers in wireless communication and wireless technologies, focusing on electromagnetics, signal processing, circuits, optics, and related fields. It is an open access journal affiliated with Czech and Slovak Technical Universities and IEEE Communications Society.
Key services
Publishing peer-reviewed scientific papers, Open access dissemination, Special issues on emerging radiofrequency topics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
toplist.cz
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
toplist.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the Radioengineering academic journal.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the analyzed page.
  3. Contact email is provided but no phone or physical address found.
  4. No security headers detected in the HTML source; HTTPS assumed but not verified.
  5. Use of jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI elements.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter linked.
  7. Publication fee policy and reviewer incentives clearly stated.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) metadata found in the HTML head.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with traditional web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a custom or legacy implementation. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. SEO and accessibility features are basic, with no structured metadata such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags present. The site includes a volume and issue selection form for journal papers, indicating dynamic content management. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not disclosed. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radioeng.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radioeng.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.