Skip to main content

Security report for radancy.com

Radancy · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radancy is a global technology company specializing in digital talent acquisition through a cloud-based SaaS platform. The company focuses on delivering branded candidate experiences and optimizing hiring processes for enterprise clients. With over 675 platform customers, Radancy positions itself as a leader in the talent acquisition technology market. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging WordPress CMS, advanced SEO plugins, and marketing automation tools such as Pardot and Google Tag Manager. Privacy compliance is well addressed with OneTrust cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly accessible, which slightly reduces transparency but is common for enterprise businesses. Overall, Radancy presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence suitable for its enterprise audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radancy.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radancy operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for talent acquisition. Its business model centers on subscription-based cloud services targeting large organizations seeking to enhance recruitment efficiency and candidate engagement. The company leverages a global customer base and maintains active social media channels to support brand visibility. The website content and structure reflect a focus on enterprise clients with clear service offerings and leadership positioning. The absence of detailed company founding information or parent company data suggests Radancy operates as an independent entity or under undisclosed ownership. The technical stack and marketing tools indicate a modern digital marketing approach aligned with industry standards.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes multiple security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent and privacy compliance are actively managed, indicating awareness of GDPR and related regulations. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may impact stakeholder confidence in security readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS privacy protection, while common, reduces domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance documents and providing dedicated security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible, or provide third-party verification to strengthen domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radancy
Description
Radancy provides a global digital talent acquisition cloud SaaS technology platform focused on branded candidate experiences and hiring optimization.
Key services
Talent acquisition cloud platform, Branded candidate experiences, Hiring optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Font Awesome, Fancybox, Pardot
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pardot
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact likely via contact page.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices evident.
  7. Social media presence across major platforms confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and marketing automation via Pardot and Google Tag Manager. The site uses CDN resources for fonts and scripts, improving load times and performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, contributing to excellent user experience. The site employs standard security headers and HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with best practices for enterprise web platforms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radancy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radancy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.