Skip to main content

Security report for r85ps.lv

Rīgas 85. pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas 85. pamatskola is a municipal primary school operating under the Riga City Council's Education, Culture and Sports Department, serving the local community in Riga, Latvia. The website provides information about the school and its activities, targeting students, parents, and local residents. The business model is that of a public educational institution funded by local government, with a focus on primary education and cultural and sports activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor and the Modern Events Calendar plugin, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern web technologies, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, and no major technical issues were detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy-related policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and branding suggest legitimacy. There are no signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms, and the content is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security practices, privacy compliance, and clearer contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r85ps.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school occupies a local niche as a municipal educational institution in Riga, Latvia, with a clear focus on primary education. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and municipal backing. The business model is non-commercial, funded by local government, targeting students and parents in the community. There is no evidence of revenue streams beyond public funding. The partnership ecosystem is limited to municipal departments. The website's operations appear stable but could improve digital engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in compliance and best practices. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the lack of incident response contacts and data protection officer information reduces readiness. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. The site should implement security headers, enforce HTTPS, and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options
  4. Publish clear contact information including incident response and data protection officer contacts
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas 85. pamatskola
Description
Rīgas 85. pamatskola is a municipal educational institution under the Riga City Council's Education, Culture and Sports Department, providing primary education.
Key services
Primary education, Cultural and sports activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Modern Events Calendar plugin, Elementor, Google Fonts, jQuery, Select2
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal primary school site in Riga, Latvia
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Modern Events Calendar plugins
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No security headers detected in provided data
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress setup with Elementor and event calendar plugins, indicating a moderate technical infrastructure. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and WordPress.org. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic and could be enhanced. There is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy implementations need improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r85ps.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r85ps.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.