Skip to main content

Security report for r64vsk.lv

Rīgas 64. vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas 64. vidusskola is a Latvian public educational institution providing primary and secondary education under the jurisdiction of the Riga City Council's Education, Culture and Sports Department. The website serves students, parents, and the local community with information about school events, news, and educational resources. The school maintains a moderate market position with recognized achievements and community engagement. Technically, the website uses a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 1.11, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media presence. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r64vsk.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a government-funded educational entity targeting students from grades 1 through 12, parents, and educators. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on education and community service. The website highlights key services such as career education, extracurricular projects, and support funds. Partnerships with platforms like E-klase and the school support fund indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The content and event announcements demonstrate active engagement and a positive reputation in the local education sector. Growth indicators include recent awards and rankings. The website's digital presence supports communication and information dissemination but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security compliance measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public educational website but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy by minimizing tracking or providing opt-out mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas 64. vidusskola
Description
Rīgas 64. vidusskola is a public educational institution under the jurisdiction of the Riga City Council's Education, Culture and Sports Department, providing primary and secondary education.
Key services
Primary education (1.-4. klase), Secondary education (5.-12. klase), Career education, Extracurricular projects and events, Support fund, E-class online platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 1.11.1, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics (gtag.js), LightGallery plugin, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of secure external libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content related to a Latvian public school.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found despite cookie usage.
  4. HTTPS is enforced with no visible security warnings.
  5. Use of common web technologies and external trusted domains.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and physical addresses.
  7. No forms collecting personal data are visible on the homepage.
  8. Social media presence via Facebook is integrated.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No incident response or security policy information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional web stack using Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 1.11.1, which are stable but somewhat outdated technologies. It integrates Google Fonts and uses LightGallery for image galleries. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs and social media SDKs. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and viewport settings but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including upgrading frameworks and improving accessibility and SEO features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r64vsk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r64vsk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.