Skip to main content

Security report for r51vsk.lv

Rīgas 51. vidusskola · Education · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas 51. vidusskola is a Latvian secondary school providing educational services primarily to students and parents in Riga. The website serves as an information portal offering news, school documentation, project details, and contact information. The site is built on Joomla CMS with common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a dedicated privacy policy page in Latvian. Security posture is moderate with basic best practices like email obfuscation but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r51vsk.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a local educational institution with a medium-sized presence in the Riga community. Its business model focuses on providing secondary education and related services, including extracurricular activities and parental engagement. The website content and structure indicate a stable institution with a history dating back to 1968. The absence of social media links and advanced marketing tools suggests a focus on direct community engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The site’s clear navigation and consistent branding support its role as an official school portal.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The presence of a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates awareness of data protection regulations. However, the lack of security headers and incident response information points to areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the provided data. The site would benefit from enhanced security configurations and transparency around security policies to strengthen trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Ensure SSL/TLS certificates are current and configured with strong cipher suites.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for broader reach and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas 51. vidusskola
Description
Rīgas 51. vidusskola is a secondary school located in Riga, Latvia, providing general education and various school-related information, news, rules, and projects.
Key services
Secondary education, School news and updates, Information on school projects and achievements, Parental information and school documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, MooTools, Joomla CMS, K2 component
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • Email address obfuscation via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Joomla-based school website for Rīgas 51. vidusskola in Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian language.
  3. Includes cookie consent banner with opt-in compliance.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and email addresses.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies found.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. Website uses multiple JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks for UI and UX.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with several common JavaScript libraries including jQuery, MooTools, and Bootstrap for responsive design and UI components like carousels and modals. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and scripts for functionality and appearance. Performance is moderate with some modern features but could be improved by optimizing resource loading. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive menus and layouts. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but could be enhanced. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured navigation but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for an educational institution but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r51vsk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r51vsk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.