Skip to main content

Security report for r360.eu

Agencja Interaktywna r360 · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agencja Interaktywna r360 is a professional digital marketing agency based in Poland, specializing in Google Ads, Facebook Ads, social media management, content marketing, website creation, and event promotion. The agency holds a Google Partner certification, indicating recognized expertise and competence in managing Google advertising campaigns. Their website demonstrates a strong market position with a medium-sized team and a portfolio of reputable clients, supported by their affiliation with Grupa MTP. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including AngularJS, Google Tag Manager, and responsive design, ensuring good user experience and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved and a formal security policy is absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r360.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketing services for businesses and organizations. Their business model revolves around providing tailored advertising campaigns, content strategies, and digital presence enhancement. The company leverages partnerships with major venues and organizations, enhancing their market reach. Their client base includes government entities, event organizers, and commercial enterprises, indicating a diverse and stable revenue stream. The presence of a blog and multimedia content suggests active engagement and thought leadership in their domain.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent management aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts is managed with user consent, reflecting good privacy practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance monitoring and auditing of third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
  5. Maintain regular updates of all web technologies and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agencja Interaktywna r360
Description
Specjalizujemy się w kampaniach Google Ads, Facebook Ads, zarządzaniu marką w social mediach, content marketingu oraz tworzeniu stron internetowych. Nasz zespół tworzy kilkudziesięciu doświadczonych specjalistów. Gwarantujemy indywidualne podejście do strategii reklamy internetowej.
Key services
Google Ads campaigns, Facebook Ads campaigns, Social media management, Content marketing, Website creation, Event promotion, Banner advertising, Email campaigns, SEO and UX audits, Film production
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tiny Slider (tns-slider), CSS Variables ponyfill, SVG graphics
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital marketing agency site in Polish language
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. Google Partner certification prominently displayed
  4. Multiple client references and portfolio items shown
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Good use of modern web technologies and tracking with consent
  7. No visible security policy or incident response info
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. Contact information includes phone and contact forms but no direct emails visible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS framework with a custom CMS likely based on Umbraco. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, with explicit cookie consent management. The site is hosted via OVH SAS, a reputable hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features such as WCAG toggles. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, canonical links, and structured navigation. The use of SVG graphics and CSS variables indicates modern front-end practices. Opportunities exist to modernize the framework from AngularJS to a more current version or alternative for long-term maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r360.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r360.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.