Skip to main content

Security report for r2s.lv

Rīgas 2. pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas 2. pamatskola is a specialized primary school located in Riga, Latvia, focusing on education for students with intellectual disabilities and severe intellectual disabilities. Established in 1925, it offers both basic and professional education programs, including vocational training in areas such as hospitality, commerce, construction, and catering. The school actively participates in European educational projects like Erasmus+ and eTwinning, enhancing its educational offerings and international collaboration. The website is well-structured, primarily in Latvian, and provides clear contact information and relevant educational content targeted at students and their families. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Oxygen and Elementor page builders, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Maps API, and Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some minor backend issues like PHP warnings in certain sections were detected. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for the educational institution, with no signs of malicious content or security blocking. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Strategic improvements include fixing backend errors, enhancing security headers, and implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r2s.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public educational institution serving a niche market of students with special educational needs in Riga. Its long history since 1925 and participation in EU-funded projects position it as a reputable entity within the Latvian education sector. The business model is likely government-funded, focusing on delivering specialized education and vocational training. The website supports this by providing detailed program information, contact channels, and engagement through social media platforms. Growth indicators include ongoing project participation and digital presence enhancements. The partnership ecosystem includes Erasmus+ and eTwinning networks, which enhance educational quality and international cooperation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. Visible PHP warnings in the HTML source indicate potential backend misconfigurations that could expose sensitive information or lead to vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie notice, though the cookie consent mechanism is not explicit. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with better backend hygiene and enhanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Fix PHP warnings and broken links in the professional education program section to prevent information leakage and improve user experience.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  3. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanism to require explicit user consent in compliance with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and third-party scripts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas 2. pamatskola
Description
A specialized primary school in Riga, Latvia, providing education for students with intellectual disabilities and severe intellectual disabilities, offering both basic and professional education programs including practical skills and vocational training.
Key services
Basic education programs for students with intellectual disabilities, Professional education programs including hospitality, commerce, construction, and catering, Preschool education, Extracurricular activities, Participation in projects like Erasmus+ and eTwinning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Oxygen Builder, Elementor, jQuery, Google Maps API, Contact Form 7, SwiperJS, Fancybox
Frameworks
Oxygen, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is for Rīgas 2. pamatskola, a specialized primary school in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English meta tags.
  3. Site uses WordPress with Oxygen and Elementor builders.
  4. Contact info is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Privacy policy and accessibility statement are present.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. Some PHP warnings visible in professional education program links indicating minor backend issues.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Oxygen and Elementor page builders, leveraging jQuery and Google Maps API for interactive features. Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA is used for form handling, providing basic spam protection. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses SwiperJS and Fancybox for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is evident from PHP warnings embedded in the HTML, indicating backend code issues that require developer attention. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires maintenance to fix backend errors and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r2s.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r2s.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.