Skip to main content

Security report for r-systems.ee

R-Systems · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R-Systems is an Estonian software development company specializing in hydrography and spatial data software solutions, founded in 1989. The company offers services including hydrographic survey software, spatial data processing, and sensor integration, targeting sectors such as military, air surveillance, logistics, and GIS. The website reflects a small, niche technology business with a long operational history but limited online presence and content depth. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Analytics for tracking. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS and shows basic performance and SEO optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal, indicating room for improvement in digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and trust. The use of Google Analytics without a consent mechanism further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with no critical security issues detected but several compliance and usability gaps. Strategic improvements in privacy policies, security headers, mobile optimization, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching r-systems.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

R-Systems operates in a specialized technology niche focused on hydrography and spatial data software. Its long history since 1989 suggests established expertise and market presence in Estonia. The business model centers on software development and integration for sectors requiring geospatial and sensor data solutions. The website's limited content and lack of detailed business information suggest a small company with a focused client base rather than broad commercial ambitions. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website. The company likely generates revenue through custom software projects and integration services. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not visible online, indicating a potentially conservative or low-profile market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with mandatory HTTPS in place but lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields are present to assess input validation or secure data handling. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Google Analytics is used without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the company's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in compliance and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and visible consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R-Systems
Description
Estonian software development company founded in 1989 specializing in durable and optimal software with expertise in data processing, real-time and historical time handling, spatial data (location information, GIS), data exchange protocols, and sensor integration.
Key services
Hydrography software, Hydrographic survey software, Hydrographic production database, Spatial data processing, Sensor integration, GIS and logistics software
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the main page.
  4. No forms detected for user input or contact.
  5. Basic website structure with minimal content and navigation.
  6. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; potential security improvement area.
  8. Website content is primarily in Estonian with some English language options.
  9. Company branding is moderate with a logo image in the header.
  10. No social media links or external business partner domains identified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site is hosted likely by Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or advanced features detected. Mobile optimization is poor, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta keywords but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks forms or interactive elements, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with r-systems.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review r-systems.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.