Skip to main content

Security report for quickfindresults.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

quickfindresults.com is a newly registered web search portal offering basic search functionality with autocomplete suggestions. The site targets general internet users seeking an alternative search engine experience. The business model appears to rely on advertising revenue, with no explicit company or business entity information disclosed. The privacy policy is hosted externally on skenzo.com, and a contact form is available for user inquiries. Technically, the site uses jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates a ConsentManager.net CMP for GDPR compliance. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic, with HTTPS enforced but missing DNSSEC and security headers. No incident response or security policies are publicly disclosed. Overall, the site is functional but lacks transparency and advanced security measures, resulting in a moderate trust and security score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quickfindresults.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the technology sector as a search engine portal, likely a small-scale or niche player given the minimal content and lack of business disclosures. The business model is advertising-driven, leveraging user search queries and tracking via consent-managed pixels. The absence of company details, certifications, or social media presence limits its credibility. The external hosting of the privacy policy may indicate reliance on third-party services. The domain is newly registered with a future creation date, which may warrant further monitoring. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of quickfindresults.com is basic. HTTPS is enabled, and the domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which helps prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing exposure to common web attacks. The site uses an outdated jQuery version (1.11.3), which may have known vulnerabilities. Consent management is implemented, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations. No incident response contacts or security policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, the site should improve its security controls and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Host privacy policy on the primary domain to improve user trust and reduce confusion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A web search portal providing a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and a search results page.
Key services
Web search, Autocomplete suggestions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, ConsentManager.net CMP, Custom JavaScript, Google Fonts (Inter-Regular), AJAX
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Consent management platform implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ConsentManager.net
Tracking pixels
kafkaLogPixelLib, endUserBehaviourPixel
Marketing tools
ConsentManager.net CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic web search portal with minimal content and functionality.
  2. No explicit business entity or company information is provided on the site.
  3. Privacy policy is hosted on a different domain (skenzo.com), which may reduce trust.
  4. Consent management platform is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact form link.
  6. No security policies, incident response, or certifications disclosed.
  7. No social media or external business profiles linked.
  8. Domain WHOIS data shows clientTransferProhibited status but no DNSSEC.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack centered on jQuery 1.11.3 and custom JavaScript for search and autocomplete functionality. It integrates a third-party consent management platform (ConsentManager.net) for GDPR compliance. The site loads fonts from a CDN and uses AJAX for autocomplete suggestions. No CMS or major frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or lightweight build. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but likely uses CDN services. Technical debt is present due to outdated libraries and missing security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quickfindresults.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quickfindresults.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.