Security report for quest.com
Quest Software · Technology · United States
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
Quest Software is a well-established enterprise technology company specializing in AI data platforms, cybersecurity, and platform modernization solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting enterprise IT professionals. The company offers a range of IT management and cybersecurity services designed to help organizations securely manage and innovate with their data. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 11, employs modern web technologies, and integrates industry-standard analytics and consent management tools, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and incident response contacts clearly provided, although a dedicated security policy page and vulnerability disclosure policy could enhance transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts transparency but not overall legitimacy.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 88/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- Medium
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- Medium
DNS health
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
- Medium
DNSSEC Not Enabled
DNSSEC is not configured for this domain
What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks
- CAPEC-142
- RFC 4033
- RFC 4035
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(l): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(l): Network security
- NIST SC-20: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-20: Secure Name/Address Resolution Service (Authoritative Source)
- Medium
Keep watching quest.com
This scan found 9 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 100
- Security headers
- 85
- Email security
- 98
- DNS health
- 85
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 88
- Average
- 93
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices to improve transparency.
- Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to engage security researchers.
- Enhance clarity on data retention policies and user data handling to strengthen privacy compliance.
- Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
- Increase visibility of data protection officer contact details and compliance certifications on the website.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Quest Software
- Description
- Quest Software provides IT management solutions focusing on AI data platforms, cybersecurity, and platform modernization to help enterprises scale confidently.
- Key services
- AI Data Platform, Cybersecurity Solutions, Migration Solutions, IT Platform Modernization
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Drupal 11, Bootstrap Icons, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
- Frameworks
- Drupal
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent mechanism
- Incident response contact available
- No exposed sensitive data detected
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Marketing tools
- OneTrust Cookie Consent
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
- Content is rich, professional, and targeted at enterprise IT audiences.
- Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are in place.
- Security best practices are observed including HTTPS and security headers.
- WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency but does not significantly impact trust given other indicators.
- No suspicious or malicious content detected.
- Multiple language versions available indicating global presence.
- Use of modern CMS (Drupal 11) and integration with analytics and consent tools.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 69/100Medium14 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with quest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quest.com.