Skip to main content

Security report for queryly.com

Queryly · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Queryly is a small technology company specializing in cloud-based search and AI solutions tailored for digital media publishers. Their platform enhances content discovery and user engagement by leveraging semantic search, AI-powered Q&A, and recommendation engines. The company has a professional online presence with clear contact information and a domain registered since 2011, indicating established operations. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Mixpanel, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and basic input validation; however, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved protection. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of queryly.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching queryly.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Queryly operates in the technology sector, focusing on providing innovative search and AI services to digital media publishers. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering APIs and cloud services that improve search relevance and content monetization. The company targets publishers who require advanced content understanding and user engagement tools. Their market position is that of an innovator with a semantic search engine and AI capabilities. The company maintains direct contact channels and emphasizes long-term innovation partnerships. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears to have a focused niche with growth potential in digital media technology.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and client-side input validation on forms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent or GDPR compliance indicators. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and privacy mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations like GDPR.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Queryly
Description
Queryly develops cloud-based search and AI technology to help digital media publishers improve content discovery, search relevance, and user engagement. They offer a search cloud platform, AI-powered Q&A, and discovery recommendation services.
Key services
Search Cloud API, AI Ask Cloud with chatbot and API, Discovery recommendation engine
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google Ads, Mixpanel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Form input validation with JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B SaaS provider for search and AI services targeting digital media publishers.
  2. Content is well structured and relevant to the business domain.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers or incident response contacts found.
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with no privacy protection, consistent with business transparency.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Mixpanel indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Forms collect personal contact data with basic client-side validation but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-bot measures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack including jQuery and Bootstrap for UI, with Google Analytics and Mixpanel for analytics and user tracking. Hosting is managed with Cloudflare DNS and GoDaddy registrar. The site loads with moderate speed and basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. There is no CMS identified, suggesting a custom or static site. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization such as improved accessibility, performance optimization, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium35 findingsView report
  2. 34/100High21 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with queryly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review queryly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.