Skip to main content

Security report for qtcloud.cz

TETRONIK - výrobní družstvo Terezín, družstvo · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

QTCloud is a Czech Republic-based technology company specializing in cloud-based queue management system enhancements. Founded in 2017, it offers modular applications including reservation systems, statistics, central kiosk management, mobile apps, and monitoring tools. The company targets both private sector businesses and public sector offices, with notable clients such as T-Mobile and government agencies. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and contact details. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted likely on Wedos infrastructure, and integrates Google services for analytics and spam protection. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy transparency and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qtcloud.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QTCloud operates in the technology sector providing SaaS solutions for queue management. Its business model is B2B focused, offering cloud-hosted modular applications tailored to client needs. The company demonstrates a stable market position with a 7+ year domain age and references from large and public sector clients. Revenue streams likely include subscription or licensing fees for software modules. The target customers are businesses and government offices seeking to optimize client service processes. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of Google services and Wedos hosting indicates reliance on established technology providers. Growth potential exists through continuous product development and expanding client base. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced compliance documentation and incident response readiness to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

QTCloud's security maturity is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect contact forms from spam. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and script integrity attributes are used on some external scripts. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. GDPR compliance is not fully demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The company should improve transparency around data protection and incident handling. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security posture supports business operations but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information and establish a formal security policy to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TETRONIK - výrobní družstvo Terezín, družstvo
VAT number
CZ00483389
Registration number
00483389
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TETRONIK - výrobní družstvo Terezín, družstvo
Description
Moderní nadstavba vyvolávacího systému, která zefektivní práci a zpříjemní odbavení klientům. QTCloud nabízí řešení pro správu vyvolávacích systémů, monitoring, statistiky, mobilní aplikace a centrální aplikace pro správu kiosků a displejů.
Key services
Rezervační systém, Statistiky, Centrální aplikace, Mobilní aplikace, Monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4, jQuery 3.2.1, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lightbox2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Cloud hosting (virtualized servers)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of integrity and crossorigin attributes on some scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and Google services for analytics and spam protection.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Business appears legitimate and established with credible references.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4 and jQuery 3.2.1, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and Lightbox2 for UI elements. Hosting appears to be with Wedos, consistent with WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are low but include potential dependency on third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize further with enhanced accessibility and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qtcloud.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qtcloud.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.