Skip to main content

Security report for qqxiaoji.com

小鸡网赚博客 · Education · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

小鸡网赚博客是一家专注于分享国内各大网站创业方法及网赚项目的中文博客，提供付费教程、会员资源下载及活动线报，面向互联网创业者和网赚爱好者。网站采用WordPress平台，技术栈包括jQuery、Bootstrap和FontAwesome，支持移动端优化和良好的SEO实践。安全方面，网站启用了HTTPS，使用了验证码机制，但缺少安全头部和隐私合规的完整实现。WHOIS信息缺失，域名注册状态不明，影响整体信任度。建议加强安全头部配置和隐私合规措施以提升安全与合规水平。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qqxiaoji.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

网站定位于网赚教育和资源分享，采用会员付费和广告合作的商业模式，拥有活跃的内容更新和付费阅读机制。目标客户为互联网创业者和内容创作者，市场定位明确，内容丰富且专业。合作伙伴包括多个相关资源网站。缺乏公开的公司注册信息和联系方式，影响企业透明度。

Security posture

网站使用HTTPS保障数据传输安全，集成了多种验证码防护机制以防止自动化攻击。缺少安全头部配置如CSP、HSTS等，未发现安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道。WHOIS信息缺失增加潜在风险。建议完善安全策略，定期更新系统和插件，建立漏洞响应流程。

Recommendations

  1. 配置并启用安全HTTP头部（如Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS）
  2. 完善隐私政策和Cookie同意机制，确保符合GDPR等法规
  3. 公开安全事件响应联系方式，建立漏洞披露渠道
  4. 定期更新WordPress及插件，防止已知漏洞利用
  5. 增强网站访问日志和异常检测，提升安全监控能力
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
小鸡网赚博客
Description
小鸡网赚博客专注分享国内各大网站会员收费网赚项目，网赚教程，网赚资源，帮助用户在互联网找到合适的发财致富项目，轻松赚取互联网第一桶金。
Key services
网赚项目教程, 会员收费教程, 网赚资源下载, 活动线报分享, 软件工具及源码分享
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Swiper.js, LazyLoad images, Custom JS for emoji support and captcha, PHP backend (implied by WordPress)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of captcha and slider captcha scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese language blog focused on internet entrepreneurship and paid tutorials.
  2. Content is updated frequently with recent posts within hours.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie consent banners despite some privacy policy presence.
  5. Contact via QQ and social login (WeChat) available.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS blocked.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

网站基于WordPress 6.6.2，使用主流前端框架和库，支持响应式设计和移动端访问。页面结构清晰，SEO优化良好，加载性能适中。缺少部分现代安全配置和隐私合规功能。无明显技术债务，但WHOIS信息缺失可能影响域名稳定性和信任。建议持续技术更新和安全加固。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qqxiaoji.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qqxiaoji.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.