Skip to main content

Security report for qbrick.com

Qbrick · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qbrick is a Nordic-based technology company specializing in providing an interactive video platform designed for businesses seeking secure hosting, advanced video presentation, and analytics capabilities. Positioned as a leading platform in the Nordic region, Qbrick targets professional users and enterprises aiming to enhance their online video strategies. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern CMS infrastructure, SEO optimization, and multilingual support via Weglot, indicating a focus on international reach and user experience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, integrating Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools such as Upsales and Bidtheatre suggests a comprehensive marketing and retargeting strategy. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency, though the professional website content and privacy policies mitigate some risk. Overall, Qbrick presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in transparency and security communication. Strategic recommendations include publishing terms of service, security policies, and incident response information, as well as verifying and disclosing domain registration details to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qbrick.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qbrick operates in the technology sector as a B2B SaaS provider focused on interactive video solutions. Its market positioning as a leading Nordic platform suggests a strong regional presence with potential for expansion. The business model revolves around subscription-based video hosting and analytics services, targeting enterprises and professional users. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to enhance customer acquisition and retention. Growth indicators include multilingual website support and integration of advanced marketing tools. However, the lack of visible contact information and corporate transparency in WHOIS data may impact customer confidence. Strengthening these areas could improve competitive advantage and market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Tracking and analytics are managed with user consent, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS registrant data further reduces trustworthiness from a domain ownership perspective. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. To elevate security maturity, Qbrick should publish clear security and incident response policies, provide dedicated security contact channels, and consider implementing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive terms of service page to improve legal transparency.
  2. Add explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Verify and disclose domain registration details to enhance trust and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qbrick
Description
Take the leap towards building a more professional online video strategy, with secure hosting, modern presentation & advanced functionality.
Key services
Secure video hosting, Interactive video presentation, Advanced video functionality
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Weglot
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bidtheatre
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Upsales
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. Professional business site focused on interactive video platform
  3. Uses modern CMS and SEO tools
  4. Has GDPR compliant cookie consent
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. WHOIS data missing, reducing domain transparency
  7. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  8. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Weglot for multilingual support, and Upsales and Bidtheatre for marketing and retargeting. The site loads external CSS and JS resources efficiently and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and to document security and privacy practices more explicitly on the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 41/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qbrick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qbrick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.