Skip to main content

Security report for pyproxy.com

PYPROXY · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PYPROXY is a technology company specializing in providing residential IP proxy services, including static and rotating IP proxies, HTTP proxies, and socks5 proxies. The company positions itself as a market leader in residential IP proxies, targeting businesses and developers who require reliable proxy services for large-scale data collection and web scraping. The website content is professionally presented with good SEO practices and customer testimonials, indicating a solid market presence and customer satisfaction. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, layui framework, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Bing UET. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and detailed security policies are absent. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy from a content and technical perspective but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and privacy policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pyproxy.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pyproxy.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11,490
Employees
0
Customers
11,490
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

78 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pyproxy.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PYPROXY operates in the proxy service sector, offering a range of IP proxy solutions tailored for web scraping and data collection. Its competitive advantage lies in providing high-quality residential proxies with features such as unlimited traffic and geographic targeting. The business model is B2B, focusing on enterprises and developers requiring proxy infrastructure. The presence of multiple customer reviews and structured data indicates an active customer base and marketing efforts. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and advertising platforms to optimize marketing and user tracking. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of detailed privacy and terms policies may impact trust among privacy-conscious clients. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on technology and internet services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements to some extent. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency in incident response. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial proxy service but could be improved with enhanced security policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Clarify domain registration details or use verified WHOIS privacy protection services to improve domain legitimacy trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PYPROXY
Description
Pyproxy provides IP proxy services with reasonable price and high quality, including static IP proxy, rotating IP proxy, static ISP proxy, HTTP proxy, socks5 proxy and other IP proxy services for large-scale data collection and network capture.
Key services
static IP proxy, rotating IP proxy, static ISP proxy, HTTP proxy, socks5 proxy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Bing UET, Cloudflare (implied by cookies and scripts)
Frameworks
layui
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Statcounter
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Baidu
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. Contact email found but no phone or physical address detected
  5. Multiple analytics and advertising scripts are used
  6. Structured data present for products and reviews indicating SEO best practices
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, layui framework, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising services such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The use of multiple tracking and advertising scripts indicates a mature digital marketing strategy but requires careful privacy compliance management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pyproxy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pyproxy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.