Skip to main content

Security report for pushalert.co

PushAlert · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PushAlert is a technology company specializing in web and mobile push notification services, targeting website owners and marketers who want to engage and re-target users effectively. Their platform supports major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, offering unlimited notifications with a free signup model. The company positions itself as a SaaS provider in the digital marketing space, focusing on enhancing user engagement through push notifications and onsite messaging. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, FontAwesome Pro, Google Fonts, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Intercom and Drift for customer engagement, and G2Crowd for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features, delivering moderate performance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and there is no published security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is well addressed through Cookiebot, with detailed cookie declarations and granular consent options. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical maturity with good privacy compliance. The absence of contact emails, phone numbers, and terms of service pages are minor gaps. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pushalert.co

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PushAlert operates in the competitive SaaS market for push notification services, leveraging a freemium model to attract website owners and marketers. Their integration with popular marketing and analytics tools indicates a focus on data-driven customer engagement. The company maintains consistent branding and a professional online presence, although explicit business contact details are limited. The use of recognized third-party services and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism reflects a commitment to privacy and regulatory compliance. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for personalized marketing solutions and retargeting capabilities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. The absence of explicit security headers and published security policies represents an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. The use of third-party scripts such as Intercom and Drift introduces typical risks that require ongoing monitoring. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could impact trust in the event of a security incident. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to complete legal documentation and clarify user agreements.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PushAlert
Description
PushAlert allows you to send push notifications to your website subscribers on Chrome, Firefox and Safari. Signup for free and send unlimited notifications.
Key services
Web Push Notification, On-site Messaging
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome Pro, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Intercom, Drift
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies with SameSite=Lax and Secure flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, G2Crowd
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
G2Crowd
Marketing tools
Drift, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page or footer.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on push notification services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome Pro for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, G2Crowd), marketing (Drift, Intercom), and cookie consent management (Cookiebot). The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with proper meta tags and structured cookie consent dialogs. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of external scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details were not available from the provided data. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 88/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pushalert.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pushalert.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.