Skip to main content

Security report for punkt.de

punkt.de GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

punkt.de GmbH is a well-established German digital agency specializing in open source web solutions, including TYPO3, Neos, Sylius, and related technologies. With over 28 years of experience and a medium-sized team, they offer comprehensive services ranging from custom web development to hosting and consulting. Their market position is strengthened by multiple technology partner certifications and a strong focus on sustainable, flexible open source solutions. Technically, the website is built on modern PHP frameworks (Neos CMS and Flow), integrates privacy-conscious analytics (Matomo), and is hosted on their own infrastructure, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of published security policies and security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, though cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, implementing security headers, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching punkt.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention punkt.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
0
Customers
8
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
13%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for punkt.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

punkt.de operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses and agencies seeking tailored digital transformation and web development services. Their business model is service-oriented, leveraging open source technologies to deliver customized solutions. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem with TYPO3, Neos, and Sylius, enhancing credibility and market reach. Their revenue streams likely include consulting, development projects, hosting, and support services. The presence of detailed job listings and specialist services indicates growth and a skilled workforce. Their transparent communication and open source advocacy position them competitively in the German digital agency market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of privacy-friendly analytics that disable cookies by default. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and no known vulnerable libraries are detected. However, the lack of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) and absence of published security policies or incident response plans indicate gaps in formal security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  5. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
punkt.de GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
punkt.de GmbH
Description
punkt.de GmbH entwickelt seit 30 Jahren kundenspezifische Weblösungen wie Corporate Websites, Webportale, Online-Shops, Intra/Extranetlösung inkl. Hosting.
Key services
Custom Web Development, Corporate Websites, Web Portals, Online Shops, Intranet/Extranet Solutions, Hosting & Infrastructure, Consulting & Agile Coaching, Specialist Services (Keycloak, Matomo, Elastic, Accessibility)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, Neos CMS, Flow Framework, Elasticsearch, Matomo Analytics, Keycloak, Sylius, TYPO3
Frameworks
Flow Framework, Neos CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics
  • Disable cookies in tracking script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on open source technologies and consulting services.
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels provided.
  4. Use of privacy-friendly analytics (Matomo) with cookies disabled.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claims.
  7. Multiple technology partner badges enhance trustworthiness.
  8. Mobile and SEO optimizations are well implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern PHP-based CMS (Neos) leveraging the Flow framework, indicating a robust and scalable architecture. Integration with Elasticsearch for search and Matomo for analytics shows a commitment to performance and privacy. Hosting is managed on their own infrastructure, suggesting control over environment and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices, including meta tags and Open Graph data. No technical debt or deprecated technologies are evident. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize compliance documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with punkt.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review punkt.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.