Skip to main content

Security report for pulsesecure.net

Ivanti · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ivanti, a leading enterprise software company, acquired Pulse Secure in 2020 and continues to offer secure network access and endpoint management solutions under the Ivanti brand. The website clearly communicates this transition and provides comprehensive information about products, solutions, and support services targeting enterprise customers seeking secure access and IT management capabilities. The technical infrastructure leverages modern analytics and telemetry tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Application Insights, combined with a robust cookie consent mechanism powered by OneTrust, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, privacy compliance, and clear incident response contacts, although explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms could be enhanced. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained digital asset aligned with Ivanti's enterprise market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pulsesecure.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ivanti operates in the technology sector, focusing on secure access, endpoint management, and IT service management solutions. The business model centers on enterprise software sales and support, targeting organizations requiring secure and flexible network access. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and regional sales channels, as indicated by references to partners like IVM EME. The website content and navigation reflect a comprehensive product portfolio and solution packages, supporting a broad range of use cases and industries. Ivanti's acquisition of Pulse Secure and other brands consolidates its market position as a significant player in secure access and endpoint management. The presence of extensive resources, support, and community engagement further strengthens its market credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and dedicated security contact channels. Use of Microsoft Application Insights without cookies and OneTrust for consent management indicates privacy-conscious telemetry. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy are not visible in the provided data and should be verified. The absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is a minor gap in transparency. Overall, the security measures align well with enterprise expectations, supporting trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Clarify and publish data retention policies related to analytics and telemetry data to strengthen privacy compliance.
  4. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve accessibility and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are present.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ivanti
Description
Pulse Secure made secure network access solutions that companies relied on to make their workforce more productive. It was acquired by Ivanti in 2020.
Key services
Secure Access Solutions, Zero Trust Access, VPN, Network Access Control, Endpoint Management, IT Service Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Handlebars.js, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry without cookies
  • Security contact information provided

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Mutiny Personalization
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website clearly indicates Pulse Secure is now part of Ivanti
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. Multiple legacy brand redirects and notices present
  4. Strong social media presence and external links to Ivanti resources
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. Good technical implementation with modern analytics and telemetry
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust for cookie consent, Handlebars.js for templating, and jQuery. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, integrated with Ivanti's branding and content management. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pulsesecure.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pulsesecure.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.